The man got 12,500 dollars after I photographed Google Street View

What does the unname general embarrassment get? Somewhere near $ 12,500. The Argentine man, who obtained his naked back, seized by the Google Street View camera and posted on Google Maps this modest amount by the Argentine court for violating his privacy and his dignity was damaged.

The man, a police officer, was naked in his courtyard in 2017 when the Google Street View came. Although he was behind a six and a half feet -length fence, the camera literally caught him with his pants. Google usually blur the faces when they appear on the camera, but it seems that Butts can pass through censorship, and the man had been dressed on the Internet, and it could be easily recognized with the street name and home address.

According to CBS NewsThe man claimed that he was insulted by the situation, which was ridiculed by his co -workers and neighbors, all because Google cameras could scrutinize his wall that kept nakedness, especially from the eyes of intruders in the natural human highlands. Google argued, according to the report, that his wall was not high enough, which is technically correct, meaning that he did not literally prevent him from photographing him-although one can reasonably assume that the wall was not installed using 360-degree carbohydrates.

The first attempt of a man was rejected to obtain compensation by a court, which he said has no compensation claim and no one blames himself for “wandering in inappropriate conditions in his garden.” This, as you know, this is not a completely wrong conclusion.

But the Court of Appeal saw this on his way, while realizing that his privacy had been violated before the image. The court said: “This includes a picture of a person who was not taken in a public place, but within the limits of his home, behind a fence longer than the average person,” describing the invasion of the “bright” privacy and the entire situation “an arbitrary storming in the life of the other.”

The court indicated that Google has an unclear practice of faces and licensing panels on the phones taken by street show cameras, so they clearly understand the possible damage that can happen if a picture of a person is published without permission. So it seems a bit strange to not blame the naked man completely. “No one wants to show an exhibition of the world as they are born,” the referees wrote.

For his problems, the man got $ 12.5,000 of Google’s damage – which is much more than $ 1 paid a couple from the Pittsburgh area Those who accused the company of encroaching on pictures through their own way, but less than Settlement of 13 million dollars In the event of collective action accusing her of collecting personal information as part of the VIEW project in Street.