The jury, Harvey Winstein for the year 2006, is in the law of re -trial of division

Photo of author

By [email protected]


The previous movie pole Harvey Winstein On Wednesday (June 11), he was convicted of one of the most important charges in retrying sex crimes. However, he was acquitted from another, and jury could not reach a third charge. The divided judgment provides some of the accused and prosecutors – but also to Weinstein – in the #Metoo Landmark case.

Related to: Harvey Winstein was taken to the hospital in New York after returning from Opsatate Prison

Details of the results of the retrial of Harvey Winstein

The jury’s strains began to leak into public opinion last Friday, when he asked the jury to exempt him because he felt that the other was treated unfairly. After that, on Monday, Al -Qubaien complained that other jury were pushing people to change their opinion and talk about the information that goes beyond the charges.

Foreperson raised similar concerns again on Wednesday. In a closed discussion with the prosecutors, the defense lawyer, Harvey, the judge, The introduction said that another juror was screaming at him because of his opinion and at one time, he pledged, “You will see me outside.” “I am afraid of the inside there,” The judge told the judge and the lawyers, according to a copy. Winstein’s lawyers were in vain for the trial every time the concerned jury submitted.

Winstein spoke himself on Wednesday, urged the judge to stop the trial. “This is not fair”, ” According to what he said, he said, For every Associated Press agency.

“My life is at stake, and you know what? This is not fair.” “It’s time, it’s time, it’s time, it’s time to say this experience has ended.”

Wincitin’s initial condemnation five years ago caused irreparable damage to the reputation and the arrival of one of the most powerful Hollywood men. It was also a pivotal moment for #Metoo. However, this condemnation was canceled last year, and the case was sent to be tried in the same Manhattan court.

This time, the majority and female jury, Harvey Winstein, condemned the force Myriam HaleyProducer and Production, to a criminal sexual law in 2006. Return was expanded on new charges related to a new charge echo Falcon. She is a Polish psychologist who said that Winstein was forced into oral sex when she was a 19 -year -old model. Winstein’s jury acquitted this criminal sex law.

What about Harvey Winstein A third charge?

The jury had to continue trading on Thursday on charges of rape, which involves a hairdresser and an actor Jessica Man. Under the New York Law, the third -degree rape charge carries a lower penalty than the first -class sex law. But the judge told the judge that he would not have to go to the jury’s room if he does not want it, adding more uncertainty in the procedures. Harvey

Winstein, 73, denies or rape anyone. He chose not to testify in the re -trial. His attorneys were accused of being the Wishing Hollywood and the creatures that have a good mind with the court’s opportunity. The team also reformulated the meetings as crimes after years to collect the settlement boxes and the #Too extension.

The key to the woman to trial speak after the ruling

Haley, who was visiting the testimony again, spoke outside the court on Wednesday (June 11). She said that the court’s operation was “stressful and sometimes stripping of humanity.” Adding, “But today’s ruling gives me hope.”

Despite the ruling on its allegations, Sukola called on the partial judgment on Wednesday “A big victory for everyone” and “Close a chapter, causing me a lot of pain throughout my life.”

In the trial, women were not very low about their capacity Harvey Winstein. Kaja Kokola has faced her own magazine. At other flash points, Jessica Mann indicated a disturbance and anger in Harvey as she was walking behind him in court. Haley cursed him from the witness platform.

Winstein defendants said that he used his influence in Tinseltown to help professional assistance, make them alone, then their trap and force them to sexual acts. They spent days to stand explaining the complexity of relations with him. Women stayed in contact with Winstein, and she saw him again, sometimes kisses, asked for invitations or preferred, according to the testimony and documents. Man said that she had a relationship with Winstein, who started before and continued after she raped her. The defendants said they were trying to calculate what happened, in an attempt to suppress the attacks for their career or try to preserve peace with an influential man.

What should you know about the case?

Winstein companies produced and distributed a series of the best Academy Award winners for decades. He stood at the Oscars as a producer of the Best winner of the Best “Shakespeare in Love” award. He also became a prominent democratic donor.

After that, in 2015, he told an Italian police model that Harvey Winstein might suddenly touch him in his office in New York. No fees came from the report. Two years later, the New York Times and New Yorker in detail decades of sexual harassment and sexual assault allegations against Winstein. Those disclosure #Metoo made a global cry that gathered for sexual misconduct and accountability.

Ultimately, Harvey Winstein was convicted of sexual crimes and sentenced to New York and California. His call to California continues. However, the highest court in New York Winstein was granted a new trial, saying that the former trial judge allowed his harmful testimony.


The Associated Press Press Jennifer Bilz and Michael R. Cisac in this report via the AP news room.

What do you think of the rooms?



Source link

https://theshaderoom.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Harvey-Weinstein-Jury-Convicts-Split-Verdict-Retrial-Me-Too-Era-1-e1749725454268.jpg

Leave a Comment