The judge says that Trump is planning to send immigrants to Libya that would violate the court’s order

A federal judge said on Wednesday that the deportation of migrants by the Trump administration to Libya would be violated by the court’s order issued in March, which creates a legal obstacle to what may be a sharp escalation to suppress the migration of President Trump.

It was written, by Judge Brian E. Murphy from Massachusetts, in response to a request from the immigration lawyer to prevent what they said was a planned American military flight to transfer a group of Vietnamese and Philippine immigrants to North Africa.

Lawyers, citing accounts from their migrant clients, who were told that they would be deported to Libya this week, argued that the removal “will be blatantly” formerly by Judge Murphy, who requires migrants to submit at least 15 days to compete for deportations to places other than their country if they have a reason for fear there.

The judge agreed.

Judge Murphy, who is appointed Biden, wrote, “If there is any doubt-the court does not see anything-then the alleged imminent removal operations, as news agencies mentioned and as the prosecutors seek to emphasize the accounts of members and general information, then it is clearly violating the matter of this court.”

The deposit came after US officials said on Tuesday that the Trump administration was Planning to transport immigrants To Libya on a US military plane. They said that the trip could have been leaving after Wednesday, which led to the deposit of migrants in a country that was strengthened by conflict and divided for years between two hostile administrations.

But after the plans were announced in news reports on Tuesday evening, the administration faced a decline. Both competing governments in Libya on Wednesday denied that they had agreed to receive migrants deported from the United States, saying that this would violate the sovereignty of the state in North Africa.

It was not clear on Wednesday afternoon whether the Trump administration would move on the trip to Libya. Mr. Trump did not directly answer a question about deportation to the nation on Wednesday. White House officials declined to comment on Judge Murphy’s order or deportation of deportations to Libya.

The decision to move forward to the deportation to Libya will be amazing, even for an administration that has already sent hundreds of migrants to the terrorist prison in El Salvador.

Libya runs many detention facilities for immigrants who described Amnesty International “Helscape” in a 2021 report, saying it found evidence of sexual violence against both adults and children.

But Mr. Trump’s assistants hope that such deportation will spread the fear among unconventional immigrants who are still in the United States and encourage them to leave voluntarily.

The number of detainees and nationalists at the risk of sending them to Libya remained clear. But in recent days, the Trump administration has prompted Libya to accept migrants from different countries, according to the administration official, familiar with the issue.

The official said the US batch included a proposal for Libya to accept more than twenty detainees from other countries. The agreement has not been completed.

In the court files on Wednesday, immigration lawyers said that they heard from the detained immigrants in South Texas whom immigration officials told that they needed to sign a document that they agreed to deport it to Libya.

“When they all refused, each of them was placed in a separate room and incurred (mainly, solitary) in order to get them to sign it,” Trina Ryano, a lawyer in the National Immigration Alliance, wrote.

Another lawyer from a Lotf man knew that he may be deported to Saudi Arabia or Libya and then moved from the detention center in Bersal, Texas.

Mrs. Rivioto and other lawyers argued that deportations would violate a temporary order issued by Judge Mirfi in March, asking the government to grant immigrants who have a “final order” for at least 15 days to compete for the deportation of the so -called third -party countries.

“Any member of the dismissal that has been removed to Libya faces a strong possibility of imprisonment, followed by torture and even disappearance or death,” said Ms. Realmuto. “Indeed, given the human rights record in Libya, it is unreasonable for the separation members of other countries to agree to remove Libya, but instead they will seek uniform to protect from moving to Libya.”

The Trump administration continued to deport people to the so -called third -party countries, despite the former order of Judge Murphy. For example, the administration continued to send the Venezuelan to the terrorist prison in El Salvador-although these issues were challenged on another legal basis: because the Venezuelan were expelled from the United States under the Eighteenth Century Law known as the Foreign Enemy Law.

The administration has defended the removal operations, saying that it does not violate the court’s matter because Judge Murphy’s ruling applies only to officials of the Ministry of Internal Security and these Venezuelan detainees were sent by officials of the Ministry of Defense.

The administration seemed to use the same playing book as they planned to send migrants to Libya on a military plane. But Judge Murphy warned last month that his matter applies to every federal agency. He said that each one, including the Pentagon, needs to make a sufficient notice of migrants before they were removed to a third nation.

Ericand Isam Al-ATRashand Hamed Alilaziz and Alan Fuwir The reports contributed.