The judge says that the Trump administration did not follow the court’s order to deport

A federal judge said on Wednesday, hours after the Trump administration had launched eight migrants convicted of violent crimes in the United States, but refused to reveal their end. The judge’s statement was a strong reprimand of the government’s Immigration attempts.

In an emergency session, he called for reports that the immigrants had been sent to South Sudan, the American boycott judge, Brian E. Murphy in Boston The eight migrants on the plane did not give a useful opportunity to object that deportation could endanger them. Minutes before the session, administration officials accused the “active judges” of defending the release of dangerous criminals.

Murphy said on Wednesday that “the administration’s procedures in this case are undoubtedly violating the order of this court,” on the pretext that the deportees did not have a “useful opportunity” to object to its sending to South Sudan. The group was transferred from the United States just hours after its realization, and they did not leave any opportunity to contact the lawyers who could object to court.

Government lawyers have argued that men had a history with the immigration system, giving them previous opportunities to express fear of deportation to a country outside their homeland. They also said that the immigration authorities had offended the matter because the judge did not specify the necessary time between notice and deportation.

The government calls on “real” threats to the individuals who have been deported

The mother countries – Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Vietnam and South Sudan did not return them, according to Lyd Lyon, the Acting Manager to impose American immigration and customs (ICE), which spoke to correspondents in Washington. He later said that the migrants either came from countries that do not regain all their citizens or have other situations that it cannot be sent home.

“This represents the real national security threats,” Lyon told a news conference. Behind him was a display of men’s photos, he said he was convicted of rape, murder, armed theft and other crimes.

Administration officials, who have been clashed over and over again with the courts because of their attempts to deport large numbers of immigrants, explained their dissatisfaction on Wednesday.

“It is tampering with the activist judge to force the United States to return these unique barbaric monsters that pose a clear and present threat to the safety of the American people,” the department spokeswoman Trichia McLeulin said in a statement after the press conference.

American internal security officials released some specific details about the deportation journey. They said that she left on Tuesday with eight people on board and said they were in the administration’s seizure on Wednesday. The officials said they could not reveal the final destination of migrants because of “safety and operational security”.

Continuous immigration campaign

The case comes amid a comprehensive immigration campaign by the Republican Administration, which pledged to deport millions of people who live in the United States illegally. The legal battle is the latest flash point, as the administration against judges whose rulings have slowed down the president’s policies.

With the silence of Congress to a large or supportive extent, Trump’s agenda opponents have submitted hundreds of lawsuits and judges were spent dozens of orders against the administration. Immigration was the most controversial issue. There was a wrong deportation of a migrant who was living in Maryland to a prison in El Salvador, as well as Trump to deport the members of the alleged Venezuelan gangs quickly without reviewing the court.

Administration officials insisted that the men who were deported had received legal procedures, but they did not provide details. Immigration lawyers said that the deportations had violated a court order against sending people to countries other than their homelands without first allowing them to do that the removal could endanger them.

Trina Rymoto, Executive Director of the National Law of Migration, requested that the judge return individuals. “They are not worthy of protection less than any other human being on this planet,” she said.

Murphy said he would try to find a “specially designed” reform of the violation. Although no person threatened directly on charges, he raised the possibility.

The judge said: “Whoever participates in illegal deportation, risks criminal contempt.”

The migrant lawyers told the judge that immigration authorities may have sent up to dozens of people from several countries to Africa. Lawyers say that the matter violates the court that people must obtain a “useful opportunity” to claim that sending them to a country outside their homeland will threaten their safety.

The apparent removal of one man from Myanmar was confirmed in an email from the Texas Immigration Officer, according to court documents. They said he was only informed of the English language, a language that he did not talk about well, and his lawyer learned the plan hours before the deportation journey.

A woman also stated that her husband from Vietnam and up to 10 other people were transferred to Africa on Tuesday morning, and lawyers from the National Law of the Migration of Immigration wrote.

Murphy, who was appointed by former US President Joe Biden, has already found that any plans to deport people to Libya without notice will work clearly violating his decision, which also applies to people who have exhausted their legal calls.

South Sudan says there is no known access

South Sudan police spokesman, Major General James James, told the Associated Press on Wednesday that no migrants have arrived in the country and that if they did so, it would be investigated and “re -reporting their right country” if the southern Sudanese is not found.

Some countries do not accept deportation from the United States. This has prompted the Trump administration to conclude agreements with other countries, including Panama, to accommodate them. The United States sent the Venezuelan to a notorious prison in El Salvador under the law of war in the eighteenth century, a procedure that is competing in the courts.

South Sudan has suffered from frequent waves of violence since independence from Sudan in 2011. Just weeks ago, the UN official in the country warned that the fighting between the forces loyal to the president and vice -president has threatened to do again in the civil war on a large scale.

The annual report of the US State Department on South Sudan, which was published in April 2024, says “important human rights issues” that include arbitrary killings, disappearance, torture or inhuman treatment by security forces, gender -based violence and sexual identity.

The US Department of Internal Security has given a temporary position to a small number of southern Sudanese who already live in the United States, who were protected from deportation because the conditions were unsafe to return. This mode is up to renewal in November.

The United States is one of the largest donors in humanitarian aid programs in South Sudan, with a total financing in 2024 with more than 640 million US dollars.