The judge is called a “raw” shoot, orders thousands of workers “immediately”

A federal judge has dealt with the agenda of Dog Ilon Musk. On Thursday, Judge William Al Sap from San Francisco said that the launch of tens of thousands of federal test workers was based on “a lie” and that the government conducted illegal expulsions – as the initiative described it as a “cheek.” ALSUP order to return the workers immediately.

Surveillance workers – that is, the new workers in the workforce and did not receive more advanced benefits and protection – have huge discounts throughout the government, and Dog and Trump’s administration tried to reduce the federal workforce significantly. The case is related to before Alsup related to the litigation of union groups representing these workers.

ALSUP is applied to thousands of federal workers I released from The Ministry of Defense, the Ministry of Old Warriors Affairs, the Ministry of Agriculture, the Ministry of Energy, the Ministry of Treasury, and the Ministry of Interior. Government executive authority Reports that About 24,000 employees will restore their jobs as a result of the judge’s decision.

Alsup said that the government’s launch of employees was not illegal because the agencies that were affected by the discounts were directed by the employee management office to do so. OPM does not have the power to provide such orders, as these orders can only be issued by the agencies themselves, The judge concluded.

Several discounts occurred a long time after the Musk Doge initiative was announced and a team of workers associated with musk on OPM. This team is said to have included many current and former employees in Musk, including Amanda Scales, a former Musk employee who was appointed as the chief of staff at the agency. On January 31, Reuters mentioned The musk assistants have stopped the employees of the functional civil service from the agency’s computer systems and participated in a kind of unannounced work that includes the aforementioned systems. After that, Democrats accused Musk of driving A “hostile body” for the agency.

On February 14, Reuters I mentioned thatAs part of the MUSK government size reduction initiative, the Trump administration began to launch “results” from government employees, whose majority are still under observation. A statement issued by OPM at that time said that the Trump administration was “encouraging agencies to use the test period as intended: as a continuation of the functional application process, and not a merit for permanent employment.”

Charles Ezel, Acting Director Acting of OPM, met the heads of several federal agencies on February 13 and ordered them to launch tens of thousands of employees, according to unions representing workers. The government claimed that EZell did not issue orders and that it was just providing “instructions.” However, Alsup recently decided that OPM had already ordered fire, illegally performed.

“The court found that the Personnel Management Office directed all agencies to finish the test staff except for the important important employees,” ALSUP Recently said.

The case before ALSUP revolves this week when Ezll Suddenly The court ordered his testimony about his role in shooting. “The problem here is that the Acting Director Ezzll has made an allied advertisement to support the defendant’s position, but now he refuses to seem to be respondent, or be removed,” ALSUP said.

Alsup, one of the appointed in Clinton, had harsh words of the Trump administration’s behavior, claiming that the government lawyers had tried to mislead it. He said: “The government tried to thwart the judge’s ability to get the truth of what happened here, and then put up subjects.” “This is not the way you work in the American boycott court.”

Ports Report that Alsup became clearly upset by the Attorney of the Ministry of Justice in Trump at different points throughout the session. “Come on, this is a hoax. Prefer. It bothers me, I want you to know that. I have been practicing or working in this court for more than 50 years, and I know how to deal with the truth.” “And you do not help me get the truth. You give me press data, Sham documents.”

“It is sad, a sad day,” he followed. “Our government will launch some good employees, and it says it was based on performance. When they know well and in good health, this is a lie.” He continued, “It should not have been done in our country. It was a trick to try to avoid legal requirements.”

Alsup also requested discovery and deposit in the case to provide more transparency about government activities. The government has bent from an attempt to draw it as a kind of left -wing radicalism. “The words that I give to you today should not be considered as a kind of” wild judge and madness in San Francisco, the administration cannot participate in a decrease in strength. “I don’t say that at all,” ALSUP said. The judge pointed out that the government cannot break the law or violate the constitution while working on such an agenda: “Of course, if he does so, it must comply with the legal requirements: the law of reducing force, civil service law, constitution, perhaps other laws.” “But this can be done.”