The Indian teacher gets a life sentence for deadly wedding bombs

A former college director in the state of Odisha in the eastern Odisha state was sentenced to lifelong to send a parcel bomb that resulted in the killing of a modern man and his great aunt in 2018.

A court found that the 56 -year -old banillal is guilty of killing, attempted murder, and the use of explosives in what became known as the “wedding ceremony” that stunned India.

The bomb, disguised as a wedding gift, was handed over to Soumya Sekhar Sahu, a 26 -year -old software engineer, a few days after his wedding.

When the couple opened the package, he exploded – he killed Saho and his great aunt, and left his wife, Rima, who opened the package, was seriously injured.

While it admitted on the pretext of the prosecution that it was a “horrific” crime, the court refused to classify it as a “rare” case that deserves the death penalty.

The British Broadcasting Corporation covered the incident in a detailed survey of two parts.

The February 2018 explosion was erected in Batnagara, a quiet city in the Bolinger region of Odisha.

The victims were only five days married and they were preparing for lunch when they were expelled to their home. It was directed to Sumaya and appears to be a wedding gift, which is alleged to be sent from Ripur in the state of Tatisjar, more than 230 km (142 miles).

When Soumya pulled a thread on the parcel to open it, a powerful explosion was torn across the kitchen, which led to his 85 -year -old aunt Jemamani Sahu. Rima, 22, survived dangerous burns, cutting the cut ear, and shock.

After a long investigation, the police arrested Meher, then 49 years old, a teacher and former director of a local college where Soumya’s mother worked.

The investigators then told me that Meher housed a grudge for professional competition and planned to attack precisely. He used a false name and address to send the bomb from Raipur by mail, and choose a fast mail service without cctv or parcel.

The bomb traveled more than 650 km (40 miles) on the bus, passing through multiple hands before delivering it. Investigators said it was a raw device but a fatal wrapped with jute threads, visited to detonate it at the opening.

Explosive name is a fake name – SK Sharma from Raipur. Weeks passed with the lack of clear suspects. The investigators searched thousands of phone records and interrogated more than 100 people, including one man who invited a threat after Rima’s participation – but nothing stuck.

Then, in April, an unknown message arrived at the local police chief.

He claimed that the bomb was sent under the name “Sk Sinha”, not Sharma, and mentioned in a hidden manner the motives of “treason” and money.

The letter claimed that three men “did the project” and are now “out of the police.” He cited the bridegroom’s “treachery” and money – hinting to a sad lover or property dispute – as motives. She also asked the police to stop harassing innocent people.

The message turned the investigation.

Aaron Botra, a police officer then headed by the crime branch in Odisha, noticed that handwriting in the parcel delivery was read: It was similar to “Senha” more than “Sharma”.

It is important, it seems that the author of the letter knows this – something that the sender could only know.

The police now believed that the suspect sent the message himself.

“It was clear that the sender knew more about the crime more than we did. By writing it was sent by a messenger, he wanted to tell us that the crime was not a local man’s work. He wanted to tell us that the plot was executed by three people. He wanted to be taken seriously, so it was a kind of blowing his fake cover by linking the error we made,” the master told me.

The victim’s mother, a university school, met the style of writing and the message as his colleague, Meher, a former director who replaced him.

The police had previously refused to compete with the workplace of Mehr as a routine academic policy. Now it is the main suspect.

Under the interrogation, Meher initially presented an unreasonable story about being forced to present the message at a threat.

The police claim that he later admitted: he stored fireworks during Diwali, extracted gunpowder, built the bomb, and sent it from Ripur using a courier.

He is claimed that he left his phone at home to create an excuse and avoid CCTV by not buying a train ticket. Mayer had attended the wedding of the victim.

I received Diditional