The global epidemic agreement that it adopted from the midst of our absence

Members of the World Health Organization adopted an agreement on Tuesday aimed at improving the preparation for the future inventory after the dismantled global response to Covid-19, but the absence of the United States is suspicious of the effectiveness of the treaty.

After three years of negotiations, a legitimate binding agreement was adopted by the World Health Society in Geneva. Member States welcomed the World Health Organization to applause.

The agreement was described as a victory for the members of the World Health Agency at a time when multilateral organizations such as those who were beaten through sharp discounts in American foreign financing were described.

“The agreement is a victory for public health, science and multilateral action. It will collectively guarantee us to better protect the world from the threats of future epidemic,” said General Manager Tedros Adihanum Guiprez.

The agreement aims to ensure access to medicines, treatments and vaccines worldwide when the next epidemic strikes. Participating manufacturers requires allocating a 20 percent target of their vaccinations, medicines and tests to the World Health Organization during the epidemic to ensure access to the poorest countries.

However, American negotiators left discussions about the agreement after President Donald Trump began a 12-month process to withdraw the United States-to a large extent, the largest financial supporter of the World Health Organization-from the agency when he took office in January.

Given this, the United States, which has poured billions of dollars in developing vaccines during the roaming epidemic, will not be binding on the agreement. Among the member states will not face sanctions if they fail to implement them.

American Minister of Health and Humanitarian Services criticized Robert F. Kennedy Junior, the World Health Organization, in a video address to the association, saying it failed to learn from the epidemic lessons in the new agreement.

“This has doubled with the epidemic agreement, which will close every job defect in response to the World Health Organization …. We will not participate in that,” he said.

An agreement draws mixed reviews

The deal was reached after Slovakia called for a vote on Monday, when the Prime Minister, skeptical in the Covid-19 vaccine, called for his country to challenge the approval of the agreement.

One hundred and twenty -four countries voted for Saleh, no countries voted against, while 11 countries, including Poland, Israel, Italy, Russia, Slovakia and Iran, abstained.

Some health experts welcomed the treaty as a step towards more fairness in global health after the poor countries left less than vaccines and diagnoses during the Covid-19s.

“It contains critical rulings, especially in research and development, which – if implemented – the global response to the pa from more shares can turn,” Michelle Child’s, Director of Policy at the neglected diseases initiative told Reuters.

Others said that the agreement did not fulfill the initial ambitions and that, without strong implementation parties, it was risked to exacerbate a future pandemic.

“It is an empty shell … it is difficult to say it is a treaty with the company’s commitment when there is a strong commitment …. it is a good starting point. But it must be developed,” said Jian Luka Borsi, Academic Adviser at the World Health Center at the Geneva Institute, an independent research organization.

Helen Clark, Chairman of the Independent Committee to prepare for the epidemic and respond to it, described the agreement as a basis for building from it.

She added: “There are still many gaps in financing, fair access to counter -medical measures and the understanding of advanced risks.”

The agreement will not enter into force until an supplement is completed to share pathogenic information. Negotiations on this will begin in July with the aim of connecting the supplement to the International Health Association for adoption, which said. A Western diplomatic source suggested that it could take up to two years to be completed.