The final arguments specified for Friday in the trial of Karen Reed II for the death of a policeman

With the closing arguments scheduled on Friday morning, jury will start circulating Karen Reed Fate after 31 days of martyrdom in her second trial due to the death of Boston John Okif, her ex -boyfriend.

Reading, 45 years old, accused of cutting the 46 -year -old outside a home party and left him to die on the ground during a snowstorm on January 29, 2022. Her defense denies a collision at all, indicating that he was attacked by a person at the party and dog instead.

Judge Beverly Cannon denied the second defense proposal to find a non -guilty on Thursday – which led to the start of the deliberations.

The following includes the basic evidence provided by both the claim and defense.

Karen Reed announces that she will not testify in her defense as Massachusetts is approaching

Prosecution issue:

• Back fragments in Ociv’s clothes
• Experts say that a vehicle strike caused Ociv to fall on the back of his head
• The phone data is in line with the trial schedule
• Read the alleged statements, “I hit him. I hit him. I hit him.”
• Read many general data that played in court

The Karen Read Murder trial reaches the final stage with specific closing pretenses on Friday

former Ayetti Bulger Defense lawyer has turned into the public prosecutor Hank Brennan, who mocked the “mob lawyer” by the supporters of voice reading, to take over the case after the trial of last year. The Assistant Lawyers of the Norfolk Province in Adam Lali and Laura McLeulin has returned from the first trial.

It is centralized in the case of Brennan that O’keefe had plastic fragments that match the Read rear lights included in his clothes.

Dr. Izak Wolf, a famous brain surgeon, said that Ociv’s injury is agreed with the “classic” fall on the frozen ground. A vital mechanic named Dr. Godson Wilsher is more likely to read it to hit him Tip To the right arm and sent it back before his head cracks on the grass at 34 Verfio Rudd in Canton, where he was found under a pile of snow after hours.

Fox True Crime follow X

Watch the final defense in Karen Read the trial pumps brakes on Lexus collision theory

In the alleged words of reading, she said repeatedly: “I hit him. I hit him. I hit him.”

The timing of the Google search for Jennifer Maccabi – “HOS Long to Die In Cold” – is another major factor, according to MAURO, a retired New York police inspector who follows the case.

“If it is at 6:23 am, it confirms the certificate of Jin Macabi,” Fox News Digital told Fox News Digital. “If you think Jane Macapi, you should be a large condemnation. Maybe you can donate the higher charge, but you must definitely condemn the wrongful killing.”

Defense issue:

• A reading that confirms that the accident never happened
• Budin defense – was the investigation Very dirty To be sufficient, the main investigator was shot
• Experts say that dog bites caused injuries to the arm, no head injury to the grass occurred and there are no signs of low body temperature
• Brennan’s reference to holes in Hodie Ociv, which was set by the crime laboratory there

Subscribe to get the real crime newsletter

The Legal Team for Reading includes attorneys of the large city of three states-David Yanite in Boston, New York City Robert ElisiAnd Alan Jackson and Elizabeth Little from Los Angeles.

In her first trial, Yanite and Jackson argued that he was “framing” by the local police and the state police. This time, they focused on the theory that Lexus LX 570 SUV has never been unprecedented.

They also published “Budin’s defense” – in an attempt to show the police investigation “insufficient”. Investigators collected evidence in red and shopping bags, and used a sheet of leaves to move the snow, and wrong evidence and did not request a inspection note for the home in the address in which they recovered the remains of Okif.

Later, former Massachusetts soldier Michael Prouctor, a killing investigator in the case, lost his job later to exchange confidential information and enforce sensitive laws on a text -ranked series of Rraining R, which also included obscene observations about the defendant.

Get updates in the actual time directly on Real crime center

Defense experts witnessed that simple fasteners on the right okiv arm were not caused by contact with the rear lights to break the reading, but rather through dog bites or animals. Dr. Daniel Wolf and Dr. Andrew Rinler The disputed results Wilshir With their own test, using a crashing doll arm they said they could not reproduce the same damage to Cells.

The strike did not come to the back of his head – which broke his skull – from contacting the frozen grass, but rather by contacting a diluted and beloved surface, according to Dr. Elizabeth Laposata, a criminal disease specialist and a clinical professor at the University of Brown.

Laposata also opposed the results of the autopsy that indicated a decrease in body temperature – which witnesses that his internal injuries came from the recovery attempts, not the damage caused by the cold.

“The issue of defense is science and science and then more science,” said Mark Pedro, a New York City lawyer, who represents the sponsorship of an ally and blogger of Canton, Cernie Cernny. “No car accident, then no crime.”

Click here to get the Fox News app

What next?

Reading faces 15 years in life imprisonment If convicted At the top. If you are convicted of unintentional death, it will face 5 to 20.