The final account reveals a direct contact with a classic task: an impossible personality

This article contains the spoilers of the “final account”.

Since the appearance of a mantle culture, many of the previous and chain properties tend to be treated with the utmost respect. Although this is a good approach in general, companies and studios have been linked to Vannum’s legs more than and often, to the extent that the main live adjustments are more than copying and glass affairs “Superfan Constitutions” It is assembled to ensure that each fans base is met. In our time for IP-MAD, the idea of ​​anyone actively insulting a long-term TV series with a new feature film is mainly curse. It is almost impossible for this project to do its work before the cameras.

advertisement

Needless to say, the nineties were different time. The version of an animated image of a long -term television program was not manufactured as the only mainly detained material was the song and the basic hypothesis, but the main character of this series was reformulated with another actor and turned into the wicked villain in the story. after “Mission Mission: Impossible” was released to Brian de Palma in May 1996I got $ 457.7 million at the box office. If this itself was released over the past decade or so, it may have made less money, and it was certain that it could have been the center of an ascetic discourse started by the fans of the 1966-1973 series (and perhaps even fans of the 1988-1990 revival).

advertisement

Even for those of us who find the Di Palm Masterpiece of Spy/Roaming Film and enjoy a relationship to convert Jim Phelps (Peter Griffs in the series, John Voette in the movie) to Badi Annani responsible for the death of his entire team, there is no denial that this draws the separation line between the inner and non -confusion. After all, there is barely no other example of the wave of modifications on the TV to the movie where the hero is converted to the villain, not to mention in favor of a loud young actor who decided to make the concession to reach him (this will be Tom Cruz as the Ethan Hunt’s agent). Although social media was nothing in 1996, there was a violent reaction against the film when it was released regardless of the fans and Especially from members of the original work team. Over the past thirty years, “Mission: Impossible” films have dug its path and heritage, as the strangeness dominates the Cruise’s Stunt Show now. However, neither the star nor the writer/director Christopher Macquari did not forget the debts they owe to the original series and the character of Jim Phelps, as it is clear through a sudden development in this month “Final Account.” It is a moment that may not be compensated for what the films did in the “original” Phelps, but make it a wonderful and mobile addition.

advertisement

in “Mission: Impossible – Dead Account” (“Part One” if you are bad), Jasper Brigz’s character (Xia Wegham) is presented, and he appears to have a slice on his shoulder with regard to the Hunt. There is nothing very clear, preventing you-not available note about the lack of Hunt’s lack of personality here, and he contemplates what someone like Hunt will do with the possession of anti-digital inflammation known as the entity there. However, Hunt’s treatment like Jonah Jameson like Hunt is my curiosity. Although Mcquarrie has never indicated any “upcoming development” in Briggs during “Dead Reckoning”, the small guide that he put in the character caused in theory about his identity over the past two years. To Al -Tarafa: Briggs is the title of the first captain of the International Monetary Fund team ever, Dan Briggs (Stephen Hill), who was the leadership of the “mission: impossible” for his first season.

advertisement

As it reveals the “final account”, Jasper Briggs is not related to Dan Briggs, but he is associated with Jim Phelps: He is his son, and shares the same name as his father. It turns out that the slide on his two parts of two parts: He has become an intelligence agent to try to save his family’s name, and he resolves from searching for the role of a man in the disappearance of his admitted traitorous father. It is an interesting complicated description, which indicates that Briggs/Phenps JR. He does not trust Ethan alike because of his well-defined recklessness, but also because his father-the parking agent for 30 years-ends up until he becomes a coat. It is a topic that was part of “Mission: Impossible” movies since the first movie, the idea that Hunt has been constantly suspected of switching the two sides (even if this aspect may be its own). From Eugene Ketteridge (Henry Chirney) easily believes that Hunt was the one who killed his team to Erika Sloan (Angela Basset) because he was convinced that Hunt was the terrorist John Lark in “He falls,” Ethane is often unreliable by those who do not know it well. In the sense of the definition, this is what the relationship between the fans of TV series and films: assuming that cruises mean that they harm their beloved display. Although this is certainly not the case, the fate of Sheikh Jim Phelps works as evidence of this.

advertisement

All this date, both on the screen and outside, gives the scene of revelation in Briggs/PhenPs with Ethan in “The Final Recking” a large amount of emotional weight, especially with the rejection of Phelps JR. Ethan’s confidence despite men’s calls. It is an intelligent option on the part of Mcquarrie and co -author Erik Jendresen, because it burns development away from being just the moment of the fans’ service. This was something that Phelps Junior had already been affected by Ethan after the events of the “dead account” and the beginning of the “final account”, during which he already turns into the former Brigz/Phelps team Dega (Gregan Davis). The reconciliation between Ethan and Philip Junior should not be easy, in fact not, especially since the ethanian betrayal by Phelps father is an incident in the incitement of the series of films.

advertisement

Although peace is between Hunt and Phenps JR. It may seem inevitable to look at the general tone of these films and this type of story, but there is another element that is the BRIGGS/PHELPS personality to help reconcile the TV series with films. Although BRIGGS/PHELPS is a discount during “Dead Reckoning”, and that he was mainly collaborated with non -conscience Kittridge during “The Final Reckong”, at any time during his appearance, it is photographed as evil, but he is just a man trying to preserve the law and the matter as the circumstances hold. So, while there is a tension between Briggs/Phelps and Hunt, there is no hostility, either, which is a relationship that does not pave only the way to condense but it allows BRIGGS/PHELPS to be morally explicit, compared to his father.

advertisement

Thus, while Ethan Hunt and (most) of his team survived the events of the “final account”, the conclusion of the film proves that the conclusion of films was never about who lives and who dies, but instead it relates to confidence. The first De Palma movie is a bitter view of unconfirmed loyalties in the post -Cold War world, and every “important” movie has been dealt with with topics of repetition, confusion, and with the rise of the entity, the loss of the same truth. It is very appropriate and satisfactory, then, that the films will end through the truth and the confidence that is restored, and the films – films and TV program – finally respect each other, with “Jim Phelps” to this series. Perhaps it seemed impossible once, but this task has been done now.