The Federal Court rules the constitutional weapons arms restrictions

The Federal Appeal Court agreed to ban Illinois to carry firearms on public transport, which reflected the minimum court ruling, which was found that the restrictions imposed on weapons had ended more than a decade ago second amendment From the US constitution.

The Court of Appeal in the seventh district submitted its decision on Tuesday, when Judge Joshua Kolar wrote to the majority that the embargo “is comfortable in a practice for centuries of reducing firearms in sensitive and crowded places,”.

“The second amendment is the individual’s right to self-defense. It does not prevent the representatives of the people from enacting laws-compatible with the traditions of the historical organization of our nation-which guarantees public transportation systems free of accessible firearms.”

The Court of Appeal prevents a 7 -day waiting period for weapons, saying it violates the second amendment

“We were asked whether the state had temporarily disarmed its citizens while traveling in crowded metal tubes, in contrast to anything that the founders imagined,” the judge continued. “We are based on the lessons of the historical organizational traditions of our nation and find any violation of a second amendment in such a list.”

Last year, the American boycott court for the northern region of Illinois sided with four prosecutors who claimed that restricting people to carry weapons on public buses and trains is unconstitutional.

The District Court relied on 2022 US Supreme Court Resolution, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. To meet this standard, the government must show that there is a “historic tradition of firearms regulation” that supports the law. The court said that there are no similar conditions that justify arms restrictions on public transport.

But the Court of Appeal found that the embargo is constitutionally protected.

“Our anxiety is whether the law is compatible with the traditions of the nation,” says the majority of the majority. “We consider that (the law) is a constitutional because it is compatible with the organizational principles that have arisen in the founding era and continue at the present time.”

The case, which many arms owners began in Illinois and supported by arms rights groups, will be resumed to the US Supreme Court.

While the prosecutors argued that the crossing restrictions have rocked 2022 Supreme Court Bridge Resolution, the seventh district said that the state showed sufficient historical basis for the treatment of crowded public transport as a “sensitive place”.

The ban on firearms for public crossing was implemented in 2013, Matthew Illinois became the last country In the country to agree to carry hidden weapons in public places.

The rules of the Federal Appeal Court govern the unconstitutional California rear rear

Click here to get the Fox News app

In addition to prohibiting weapons on buses and trains, the restricted scale possesses weapons in hospitals and some other public places.

Kolar, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden, joined the majority of Judge Kenneth Ripple, who was appointed by former President Ronald Reagan. Judge Amy Saint -Yves, chosen by President Donald Trump during his first term, wrote a separate opinion.

“I am writing separately to highlight a difficult judicial issue that today’s opinion maintains wisdom in a future case: how to assess the ability to recovery when the plaintiff determines that it is the inability to engage in protected activity – the threat of prosecution does not calm down to do so – and the law that did not empty this precise activity also prohibits.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.