The Federal Appeal Court adheres to the prohibition of gender transition in Arkansas for minors

The Federal Court of Appeal upheld on Tuesday Arkansas Law Preventing doctors from providing medical treatment for gender transition to minors, reflecting the minimum court decision that prevented the first law in the state.

The Court of Appeal in the eighth American district sentenced 8-2 on Tuesday to cancel the minimum decision of the court, which now allowed the state to enforce the law. The Court of Appeal was martyred US Supreme Court Resolution in June supports a similar embargo in Tennessee, in which the country’s highest court ruled that the law was constitutional and did not distinguish against transgender people.

In reference to the Supreme Court’s decision, the Court of Appeal agreed with the Prolent -Prisoners of Arkasas Tim Griffin, a Republican, that the law did not violate the rights of equal protection in the transgender palace under the American constitution.

“I commend the court’s decision and make it happy Children in Arkansas “He will be protected from experimental procedures,” Griffin said in a statement after the ruling.

The Federal Court rejects the challenge of the Oklahoma Law, which prohibits the treatment of the gender transition to minors

Arkansas Republican Governor Sarah Hakabi Sanders wrote on social media that the referee “is a victory for a good sense – and for our children.”

Arkansas became the first American country to prohibit transformed treatments such as puberty, hormones and minors in 2021, when the Legislative Council led by Republicans approved the ban after the veto of the then governor of the Labor Party, Asa Hatshenson.

Four families of sexually transformed children and two seekers defied the law, on the pretext that the law to save adolescents from experimentation (safe) has violated the rights of the procedures due to parents under the fourteenth amendment of the United States constitution.

When writing the majority of the majority, the American district judge, Duan Benton, said that parents have never been entitled to obtain a medical treatment for their children, who was banned by the state government.

The judge also wrote that The minimum court decisionThe American boycott judge, Jay Modi, spent in 2023 that the law distinguishes against transgender people and raises “immediate and irrevocable harm” for transgender children, and contradicts the Supreme Court’s decision in the Tennessee case. The law was also banned from the valid in 2021.

Meanwhile, the American circle judge, Jane Kelly, wrote in the opposition that there is “an amazing shortage of evidence that links Arkansas’s ban on gender care for her alleged goal of protecting children.”

The American Civil Liberties Union and the American Civil Liberties Union in Arkansas were among the groups representing the prosecutors.

Scotus rules on the state’s ban on gender transition “treatments” for minors in the case of history

“This is a tragicly unfair result for transgenderly converted, their doctors and their families,” ACLU, ACLU, ACLU, said in Arkansas.

“The state had every opportunity and failed at every turn to prove that this law helps children; in fact, this is a dangerous law that harms children.” “The law has already had a profound impact on families throughout Arkansas who all deserve a basic right to do what is better for their children. Since we and our agents are thinking about our following steps, we want the transgender people Arkansus to know that they are far from alone and we remain designers as is the case in securing their right to safety and dignity, and equal access to the health care they need.”

Click here to get the Fox News app

The ruling on Tuesday comes after 10th Court of Appeal in the United States Unanimously ruled last week that a similar prohibition in Oklahoma is a constitutional, also depends on the Supreme Court’s decision on Tennessee.

Reuters contributed to this report.