The exciting exciting excitement of Nicole Kidman is a strong blow to the maximum

Apparently, the Max subscribers are looking for something saturated with steam – because this exciting excitement of Nicole Kidman is a better option on the HBO and Discovery ownership platform.

according to LetterolThe film crushes the maximum plans – then, what is going on around it in the first place? For beginners, “Babygirl” – who struck the theaters in 2024 and is written and directed by Halina Regin – About Rumi Mattis (Kidman), an executive director of New York City who has a “happy” life with her husband Jacob (Antonio Bandras), Bentries Isabelle and Nora (Esther McGregor and Faghan Riley). Deeply It was not sexually realized. Samuel, one of the new trainees in Rumi, as Harris Dickenson (known as Projects such as “Sad Triangle” And “The Iron Claw”, with which Rumi begins in an affair … but when Samuel begins to pay the borders by appearing in Rumi’s house and interacting with her family as a form of domination, Rumi finds herself contradicts the options she has taken.

advertisement

Although Kidman (she is an Oscar -winning performer, after all) The huge shows that Dickenson, and Bandras in particular, “Babygirl” have not received any major awards outside the festival circle. However, the movie definitely It is worth seeing, especially because Regin and Kidman worked closely together to represent the story of a woman who discovers her sexual life while her entire life is at risk. So, how do critics deal with “Babygirl” when it appeared on Christmas Day 2024?

According to the consensus on critics on Spoiled tomatoes“Nicole Kidman and Harris Decinson are grown together in” Babygirl “, with writer Halina Regin Clinical while maintaining this explicit sexual excitement more provocative than itching”-and when she adds to a 76 % critical classification, you have a very decent reception. What about individual critics, though? First, I must say that The movie BJ Colangeo Film gave the movie 8 out of 10In conclusion, “Babygirl” realizes that both Romy and Samuel enjoy each other in completely different conditions, and this makes everything very exciting. “

advertisement

to ApplicableChristie Boko brilliantly praised Regen, saying: “Emotional, irrevocked, invalid, fun, exploring the Regin movie with the joy of complex relationships that link. Amidst intense competition, one of the most sexual and more annoying films offered in the year.” Nick Sager agreed at The Daily BeastAlthough he was singled out Kidman and took things a little bit … “He boasts an exceptional Nicole Kidman’s performance as a woman recklessly from who she is and what she wanted – as well as the euphoria that has been reassuring for a long time – it is an exciting and entertaining snapshot of a cinematic Vigra.” more than Traded stoneThe most prominent David Fear highlights the film for the fun of females, and writing, “Kidman makes you feel that this is not just a provocation as much as it was confusing what if. As in: What if the movie takes the sexual activity of females outside the vanilla world seriously?”

advertisement

no all One critic was completely sold on “Babygirl”, though! NPRJohn Powers had a mixed vision of the film, and wrote, “Babygirl’s Problem” is not a Rumi’s desire to control it. It makes its exciting liberation victorious to the extent that the sexual politics of the story does not matter. ”Writing to GuardianPeter Bradche agreed with this feeling: “Kidman has not previously played different roles in sophisticated urban sites … No one is better in elegant play and Soignée and developed. But she cannot and Dicenson can make an actual excitement.” However, no one denying that Regin has taken this movie, which is exactly what she wanted to do.

Through the multiple interviews between the premiere of the first movie at the Venice Film Festival in August 2024 and its wide release on Christmas Day of that year, Halina Regina spoke widely about the intention behind “Babygirl”, which shed light on the sexual activity of complex females and helping to normalize age gaps when it comes to relationships. (Harris Dickenson is smaller than Nicole Kidman, to return it only.) To get more specific. Vanity Fair Its real goal was to highlight the “orgasm” of men and women, which means that she wanted the center of female pleasure on the screen. “In movies, she still often sees that women have an anatomically uncompromising intercourse on the anatomical screen,” Regen noticed before sharpening the central conflict in Rumi in the movie: “The more perfect you want to be, the more dangerous things begin to collapse – and you have to deal with the things that actually beyond you.”

advertisement

that it Deficiency From the arrangement of Samuel and Rumi-in that flat embarrassment in some sex scenes in the movie-which distinguishes “Babygirl” from other exciting excitement (although Regin also told the director that she was inspired by films such as “basic instinct” and “inappropriate proposal”). As Regin said, this film revolves around human sexual life, not a very imaginary life Release Of human sexual sexual, we often see a photographer on the screen. “They are trying to play these different and enjoyable roles with each other, but they can also be frightening and embarrassing,” said Regen of Samuel and Rumi – later in the movie, Rumi and Jacob. “We do not show this shiny imagination, it is in fact an attempt to show the human side in all of this. In my eyes, the atmosphere is more hot because it is not just a perfect final result – which is often walking in the bedroom,” he added.

advertisement

There is no doubt that Regin succeeds, and although “Babygirl” will definitely inspire some discourse because it continues to explode alike, this is a kind of point … which is definitely It is worth checking. “Babygirl” flows to the maximum now.