The Eritrean man wins the ban when removing France under the deal “One in, one outside”

Eritrean man arrived in the United Kingdom on a small boat in a legal claim at the last minute to temporarily prevent him from being removed to France.

The 25 -year -old was scheduled to return on Wednesday under a pilot plan “One in Out out” agreed in July between the United Kingdom and France.

In the first legal challenge against the deal, in the Supreme Court of London, his lawyers argued that he needed more time to provide evidence that he may have been a victim of modern slavery – and the decision to remove it was transferred.

The Minister of Science told Liz Kendall BBC that the ruling was “a temporary judgment on one individual” that would not stop the deal.

Kendall said: “This important deal will not really prevent from moving forward, a deal that says if you come to this country illegally, you can deport and you will be deported,” Kendall said.

She said that the ministers have never claimed that the deal would be a “silver bullet to address all problems”, but she insisted that a young Mahmoud is determined to ensure its success.

Al -Zarji raises serious questions about whether other migrants for trips will use the same reasons to delay or prevent their removal.

The Ministry of the Interior’s lawyers argued that he could have demanded asylum in France. They added that delaying his departure could encourage others dedicated to return trips this week to submit similar claims, and to undermine the public interest in deterring the deadly fatal boats crossings.

But during the session, it appeared that although the officials of the Minister of the Interior refused his claim that he was a victim of slavery, they also said in today’s message that he had the right to provide more acting – and that they did not expect to do so from France.

The judge Shaldon, who refused the man’s claim that he would leave homeless and naked in France, said that he would nevertheless have the prohibition of the man’s departure in light of this development temporarily.

He said, “There is a serious issue that can be tried regarding the demand of trafficking and whether or not the Foreign Minister has carried out her legal duties in a legal way.”

“If there is a reasonable doubt that it has been smuggled – this does not mean trafficking in France or from that – this will be a legal tape to remove for at least a short period of time.”

The judge said that the man’s lawyers should do everything that can be made more acting within 14 days, so that his case can be completed in a future hearing.

A BBC spokesman told the BBC that the government expects the first revenues to take place informally and that the temporary ruling will not prevent the broader policy.

But Imogen Townley, a Wilson LLP lawyer who represented asylum seekers, said that there appears to be “an arbitrary and chaotic approach to choosing people who reach small boats.”

She said that while the legal claims that carry the removal operations were accepted, it would be frustrating to the government, it was “worth it to have due legal procedures and a just system.”

“It is not realistic to believe that the individuals who fell in the plan do not have individual circumstances (preventing their removal),” Towlley said.

She said she did not think that the UK deal was disgusting because there was no comprehensive problem “with the design of the plan.

Kimi Padnouch responded to the news of the gossip with “We did this”.

Speaking to LBC, the conservative leader called for “some difficult laws” and said, “We mainly transform our country into a refuge for anyone who may even have the slightest amount of misery in any other country.”

Reform leader Nigel Varage said that even if the policy succeeds, this will not lead to a decrease in the numbers of immigration as “one, one, and with another, it still means in addition to one for everyone who crosses the channel.”

The papers recorded in the Supreme Court show that the man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, left Ethiopia to Europe two years ago, where he arrived in Italy in April 2025.

A month later, he left for France, where charities, including the Red Cross, helped him before his mother paid $ 1,400 (1024 pounds) for smugglers to cross his channel to the United Kingdom.

More than 30,000 people have crossed the canal in small boats so far this year.

This is the first point in a evaluation year. This number was passed since the crossing data was reported for the first time in 2018.

Prime Minister Kiir Tar and French President Emmanuel Macron announced in July.

Under the treaty, France agreed to restore immigrants who traveled to the United Kingdom by a small boat, and the asylum claim was withdrawn or unacceptable.

For everyone who has returned to France, the United Kingdom accepts a person with a protection case as a refugee who has not tried to cross the channel.

No one has yet been removed under the plan. The first returns to France were expected to start from Tuesday.

Over the past two weeks, some migrants detained in immigration removal centers have received messages saying that they will be placed on France’s new flight leaving from Heathro Airport for Paris at 9 am this morning.

However, a number of BBC sources told that some potential travelers have been told that their departure would be postponed with more representation on their issues.

“When the correspondents were asked – before the Supreme Court ruling – if the plan was” planned, “a government spokesman said,” No. “

They added that the government was “confident in the legal basis of this pilot. We have taken steps to ensure its compliance with local and international law; as is the case with any policy, we are ready to respond to any legal scrutiny that happens.”

The discussion on the role of the European Human Rights Convention, which was a rod for lightning for the political right since before Rwanda’s failed plan for the previous government.

Conservatives will appoint their position on the European Human Rights Convention at their conference next month, with widespread expectations that they will be descended alongside withdrawal.

Sir Kerr said that this is not something he wants to do, so pressure on his government to show that they can make their returns.