The Environmental Protection Agency wants to retreat emissions control elements on power plants

Zilden and the legislators who spoke on Tuesday praised the original mats, where they photographed the update of 2024 as a transgression by the Biden administration, which imposed unjustified costs on the fossil fuel industry. (“We do not remove the mats,” said Zealin. Fought Against the implementation of the original base, experts who spoke to WIRED refer abroad.

“They do not want to increase mercury pollution around their neck,” says Jolly McKinamara, Assistant Director of Policy with the Climate and Energy Program in the Union of the relevant scientists. “Mercury is strong nervous toxins that affect the most weak. When coal factories finally installed pollution controls, we had huge discounts of mercury pollution and incredible benefits associated with that. I think this is why she wanted to try to keep the mantle of public health protection and attention, while trying to look like just radical adjustments.”

Decides are part of a larger attack on the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to organize carbon dioxide as a pollutant, and part of an effort at the management level to divorce climate science from politics. Earlier this year, Zealin said that the agency would look forward to targeting the discovery of exposure, a major design taken by the Environmental Protection Agency in 2009, which identified greenhouse gases as dangerous to public health and luxury. This step – which was identified in the project 2025 – was used to general objections Even from the fossil fuel industry groups Like the American Petroleum Institute and the Eldison Electric Institute, which represents the facilities companies.

The killing of the discovery of risk will require a much higher legal tape from the power plant regulations. The proposed rules will be open for public comment, as the agency stated that the final rule must be issued by the end of the year; Experts who spoke with WIRED say they expect to challenge this last step in court. However, they all emphasized the fact that the proposal goes beyond and exceeded what the Trump administration tried to do in eliminating climate regulations in its first term.

“This is a very big problem, the Environmental Protection Agency is trying to weaken itself,” says McKinnara. “This says,” We do not believe that we must organize carbon emissions from power stations. “If you cannot justify the organization of power stations, you cannot justify the organization of oil and gas emissions.”

Meanwhile, the planet continues to become hotter. Figures from the MAUNA LOA Observatory on Hawaii appear quietly by NOAA last week that May is 430.2 parts per million (part of a million), which is the first time in the recorded date, as the seasonal averages of carbon dioxide exceeded 430 parts per million, and 3.5 parts per million higher than the average May in the past year. This reading It comes to the heels Among the similar characters that the agency shrinks in April, the largest leap ever showed the carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere between 2023 and 2024.

“Another year, another record”, Ralph Kelling, director of the Scripps Co2 program, He said In the release of the May numbers. “It is sad.”