theEnvironmental Protection AgencyOn Wednesday suggested canceling the rulesReducing greenhouse gas emissions from the planet from power plantsFeed it by coal and natural gas, a procedure that the official told me Zeldeen that he will remove billions of dollars from the costs of industry and help the US energy “launch”.
The Environmental Protection Agency also suggested weakening the regulations that require power stationsReducing mercury emissionsAnd other toxic pollutants that can harm the brain development of young children, contribute to heart attacks and other health problems in adults.
The declines aim to fulfill the repeated pledge of Republican President Donald Trump on “Unleash American energy“And make it more affordable for Americans to operate their homes and operate companies.
If approved and final, the plans will reflect the efforts made by the administration of Democratic President Joe Biden to addressClimateImproving conditions in areas that are strongly burdened with industrial pollution, most of them in low -income societies, a black majority, or Spanish origin.
The rules of the power plant are among the about 30 environmental regulations targeted by Zealin in March when he announced what he called“Most of the day hesitated to cancel restrictions in American history.”
Zeldin said on Wednesday that the new rules will help end what Biden and Obama’s departments called “the war on many US local energy supplies.”
“The American public spoke loudly and clearly last November,” he added in a speech at the headquarters of the Environmental Protection Agency. “They wanted to make sure that … regardless of the agency that anyone might be confirmed to lead, we find opportunities to follow the logical pragmatic solutions that will help reduce the cost of living … create functions and enter in a golden age of American prosperity.”
Environmental and public health groups described the dangerous declines and pledged to challenge the rules in the court.
Dr. Lisa Patel, a pediatrician and executive director of the Medical Association on Climate and Health, described the proposals “other in a series of attacks” by the Trump administration on “our health, our children, our climate and the basic idea of air and clean water.”
She described it as “unreasonable to believe that our country will go back on something sound like protecting children from mercury and our planet from exacerbation of hurricanes, forests, floods, and bad air quality driven by climate change.”
“Ignore the tremendous damage to public health of energy stations is a clear violation of the law.” Added Manish. “If the Environmental Protection Agency has ended the Slapdash effort to cancel these rules, we will see them in court.”
The rules targeting the Environmental Protection AgencyIt can prevent an estimated 30,000 deathsProviding 275 billion dollars every year, according toThe Associated Press examThis included the previous reviews of the agency and a wide range of other research.
It is not in any way that the rules are completely eliminated – it cannot be changed without going through the process of setting federal rules that may take years and require a general comment and scientific justification.
Even the partial dismantling of the rules meansMore pollutants such as smoky fog, mercury and lead– AP analysis found that AP analyzes found in particular the air portable particles that could be launched in the lungs and cause health problems. This also means higher emissions of greenhouse gases, which leads to the high temperature of the Earth to more deadly levels.
Biden, democratic, made the fight against climate changeA distinctive feature of his presidency. Coal power plants will be forcedCapture chimney emissions or closeUnder the strict EPA base issued last year. Michael Regan, head of the power plant, said that the rules of the power plant will reduce pollution and improve public health while supporting reliable and long -term electricity supply.
The energy sector is the second largest shareholder in climate change, after transportation.
In its proposed organization, Trump argues the Environmental Protection Agency that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from the power stations that work in fossil fuel “do not contribute significantly to dangerous pollution” or climate change, and therefore does not meet a threshold under the clean air law law. The Environmental Protection Agency said: “The greenhouse gas emissions from coal and gas plants” are a small and diminishing part of global emissions, “adding:” The priority of this administration is promoting public health or social welfare through energy dominance and independence guaranteed using fossil fuels to generate power. “
The clean air law allows the Environmental Protection Agency to reduce the emissions of energy stations and other industrial sources if these emissions contribute greatly to air pollution that displays public health.
Megan Greenfield, a former lawyer for the Ministry of Justice, said in a special practice in Jenner & roadblock LLP.
She said the proposal of the Environmental Protection Agency “has the ability to have much wider effects.”
Zeldeen, a former member of Congress in New York, said that the rules of the Biden era have been designed to “strangle our economy to protect the environment”, with the intention of organizing the coal industry “from existence” and making it “disappear”.
The head of the National Mining Association and CEO of Rich Nolan praised the new rules, saying they are removing “unintended criteria” for a fair air with “a stadium settlement for reliable energy sources, instead of accumulating the deck against them.”
But Dr. Howard Frumkin, the former director of the National Center for Environmental Health and the Honorary Professor at the Faculty of Public Health at Washington University, said that Zealin and Trump are trying to deny reality.
“The world is round, the sun rises in the east, and coal and gas power plants contribute significantly to climate change, and climate change increases the risk of heat waves, catastrophic storms and many other health threats.” “These are indisputable facts. If you empty the regulations on the greenhouse gas emissions of the power plant, you raise the health and welfare of the American public and contribute to leaving a world of risks and suffering to our children and grandchildren.”
A paper published earlier this year in the Journal of Science found that the rules of the Biden era can reduce the energy sector emissions in the energy sector by 73 % to 86 % less than the levels of 2005 by 2040, compared to a 60 % reduction to 83 % without the rules.
“Carbon emissions in the energy sector have decreased by a faster rate with the rules of (Baiden era) in force without it,” said Aaron Bergman, a resource colleague for the future, a non -profit research institution and a co -author of the science paper. He said that the Biden base will also lead to “a significant decrease in sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, which are pollutants that harm human health.”
This story was originally shown on Fortune.com
https://fortune.com/img-assets/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GettyImages-2207988130-e1749718735966.jpg?resize=1200,600
Source link