West Ham United midfielder Lucas Paqueta He is considering taking legal action against the Football Association (FA) after its purification Fall repair accusations. Its legal team is said to be discussing all possible options after it has given an independent committee a harsh assessment of the FA case.
The 28 -year -old Brazilian has been accused of four charges of intentionally capturing the yellow cards to influence the betting markets. The FA claimed that Paqueta “has intentionally sought to receive a card from the referee for an inappropriate purpose is to influence the betting market in order for one or more of the betting to benefit” in matches against Leicester City, Aston Villa, Leeds United and Bournemouth between November 2022 and August 2023. Manchester showed interest in Paqueta registration. For 80 million pounds.
He denied committing any violations and was completely cleared in July 2025. Written reasons It was issued on Wednesday (September 3), and revealed how the Football Association collected its case and explained the reason for the committee.
“There is no independent expert assessment”
At the heart of the union case, the betting activity that was marked by the International Referegiament Association was the International Referegiament Association. However, the committee criticized the English Federation because of the miles strongly for its private investigator instead of bringing an independent betting expert.
“From the committee’s point of view, the evidence submitted by the English Federation on the betting data had a clear defect, that is, the lack of an expert’s independent evaluation of these data. The FA chose to develop the most important element in its case without any independent expert evaluation, from the committee’s point of view, surprise.” – FA vs lucas paqueta
“As before the union, the most important element in its case was simply not invited the evidence of independent experts,” the report mentioned.
“Accordingly, while Mr. Astley’s mistake was not, as he was doing what was directed to doing, in the circumstances in which FA was clearly accepted and frankly that Mr. Astley was not an independent expert, from the committee’s point of view, the evidence that FA provided on betting data had a clear defect, which is the lack of an independent expert assessment.”
The committee added that there are other interpretations of the activity of betting, which were just as much: “The patterns of betting may have emerged from a fairly random passage of the” hot tips “or” internal information “inside Brazil as much as they may have come out of localization.
The committee also criticized the use of the Football Association for performance evidence, which it said had suffered from “confirmation bias”. He indicated that accidents on the field “were interpreted in a manner that was guilty of a guilty interpretation when it was actually equal at least with regular football procedures.”
The status of the FA also weakened when the analysis of the phone data, which was a major part of their argument, was rejected after their experts agreed to the competing show by the independent Paqueta analyst. “The English Federation accepts that this evidence … no longer has a value or weight of proof, which FA was originally considered,” the committee registered.
In the end, the committee concluded that the English Federation did not meet with the criterion for the necessary proof to support the charges: “The burden on the National Union remains to prove the issue to the balance of possibilities … We unanimously conclude that the union cannot come out of the burden on it.”
Paqueta may consider taking legal action against FA
FA V Lucas Paquetá – written reasons: https://t.co/svhxqoyvjh
The written reasons for the Independent Organizational Committee have now been published in the Paquetá case.
Running to more than 300 pages, it is understood that the decision is the longest judgment related to sport ever … pic.twitter.com/nsigmpoagd
– Nick de Marco Kc (NickDEMARCO_) September 3, 2025
For Paqueta, the decision is a great relief after spending more than a year under doubt. His lawyers now decide their next step, with sources informing BBC Sport They are looking at all options, including potential legal procedures against the FA because of the accusations.
The player, Nick de Marco Ki, wrote on X: “Running to more than 300 pages, it is understood that the decision is the longest judgment related to sport ever in the world-a reflection of the seriousness of the issue, the amount of evidence that was published in what was the largest case in the history of the National Union, and one of the most in my profession as a sports lawyer.”
Distinctive image: egghead06 / copy. Participate both 4.0 international
Pamphlet The English Premier League star Lucas Paqueta is considered to prosecute FA “after the collapse of the immediate installation case First appear on reading.
[og_img]
Source link