The diet exchange study reveals how to spread the foods that have been prepared with superior

In the event that you need more incentives to reduce the highly processed foods, the study of a new diet reveals today that people have suffered more weight loss while eating minimal foods than they did when they eat a nutritional similar diet.

In a six -month experience led by scientists at College University in London, the study participants were appointed one of the diet systems to follow up for eight weeks, then they took a four -week break before the other eight -week diet was replaced. Participants have lost more weight while eating a minimalized diet than a very treated system; They also delivered more unhealthy fats. Results, published Monday in nature medicineThe researchers said that the ultra -processed diets are, among other things, that the meals full of treatment are especially good in fueling the intense desire for people’s food.

Although there is some debate About what constitutes a super treatment, there are generally products or ingredients that have passed with high levels of industrial treatment, such as sausage, candy or soft drinks. There is an increased mountain of evidence that indicates a diet rich in foods that have been prepared In general It is a diet that is often consisting of whole foods, and these super -prepared foods may raise the risk of some diseases. However, most of this research only shows a relationship between supercorously treated diets and the poorest health results, not a direct link to the cause and the result. The researchers said that clinical trials can provide stronger evidence, but it is difficult to do in the world of nutrition science for many reasons, especially financing.

“Clinical trials are expensive, and there was less funding for diet and nutrition system in view of their importance to health,” the author of the study. Sam DickenA research colleague at the Department of Behavioral Sciences at the University of California, told Gizmodo. “We were lucky because we have joint financing from a medical charity and an irregular organization in the United Kingdom to finance the experiment.”

The study included 55 adult volunteers who took a processed diet or a very processed diet consisting of pre -packed meals for eight weeks, then they took a four -week break before switching to the diet they had not yet eaten for another eight weeks. More importantly, both eating systems have been designed to follow the UK dietary recommendations, and therefore the very treated diet was not designed to be completely different in the nutritional quality of the minimal processed diet. For example, the very processed diet included breakfast pills as a meal, while the equivalent meal was the minimum oatmeal overnight.

Regardless of any diet that followed them, they lost their weight, but the difference between the two systems was great. People who eat a diet that treats a minimum of 2 % of their basic weight, while those in the processed high -treatment diet have lost 1 % and consume more calories in general. People who lost their weight on the minimalized diet specifically lost more than the mass associated with fats and vasral fats more than they did in the extremist diet. Violent fats are surrounded by our abdominal organs and are associated with healthy results worse than other types of fat in another place in the body.

Dicken said the results highlight the importance of following government food guidelines. But the study also indicates that people who want to lose weight may see the most minimal adherence to the minimal. Regarding foods that are prepared high -treatment, researchers have their educated guesses.

Ultra -treated foods tend to have more attractive textures and artificial enhanced flavors, which often means that they are softer or easier to eat, and tastes. Their appearance and packaging may also make more attractive to potential customers. Interestingly, the volunteers in this study stated that both systems were equally satisfactory to eating on average, but they also reported better control of the craving for a minimalized diet. Dicken noted that researchers were unable to test these possible interpretations directly in this experience, so more research is needed to know this for sure.

The team has already launched their next study, which tests the behavioral support program to reduce people’s intake of highly treated foods. But Dicken warned that it would take widespread societal transformations, not an individual reprimand, to change our collective meals for the better.

He said: “There is a need for policy procedures that improve our food environment and stay away from individual responsibility to ensure access to healthy meals at reasonable prices for all.”