The court says that the crash of India has dealt with “irresponsible”.

The country’s highest trial in the country was strongly criticized for dealing with the aftermath of the crash of the Air India, which killed 261 people in June.

Leave One of the survivorsThe flight heading to Gatwick Airport from Ahmed Abad was briefly crashed, killing 242 passengers on board and 19 others on the ground.

The court said that it is “irresponsible” to suggest that the flight authority to the media to the media that this experimental error had caused the disaster.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi called for the government’s response before he was sentenced to a case filed by activists calling for an independent investigation.

The court said that the way the Aviation Authority issued its initial report in Boeing Dreamliner was “selective and piece.”

The initial report, published By the AAIB aircraft investigation in July, fuel supplies to the engines said just seconds after taking off.

The report also said that one of the pilots had heard the other as “why it was cut” in recording the sound of the cockpit, with another pilot responding that he did not.

The registration does not explain who said what. At the time of takeoff, the co -pilot was flying the plane while the captain was watching.

However, the results of the report faced a challenge by the Salama Airline Safety Corporation, which calls for an independent investigation into the accident.

In a court hearing in the court that supervises the seam of the flight safety group, one of the Supreme Court judges in India said that the proposals that the pilots had deliberately closed the fuel supplies “very unfortunate and irresponsible.”

The accident has left a lot of doubt about the safety of India’s airspace.

Chairman of the General Directorate of Civil Aviation (DGCA) Defend the safety record in the countryBBC tells in July that “the sky of India has been always safe.”

In the same month, DGCA 51 revealed a violation of safety in Air India in the previous yearAs part of its annual audit of the country’s airlines.

Four families of Matta on the plane filed a lawsuit in the United States against Planemaker Boeing and the manufacture of Haniole’s aircraft spare parts, accusing neglect companies.

The lawsuit accused the companies of “nothing” despite its awareness of the risk of plane design.