- A week after the announcement that artificial intelligence will eventually replace workers In the language learning application, the CEO of Duolingo said that the company “continues employment” and will support its current workers in accelerating technology. Klarna’s start -up is followed in retracting the first promise of artificial intelligence.
App Duolingo has become the language of the most recent company that publicly relieves artificial intelligence after a series of bold statements on artificial intelligence that replaces people with great criticism.
Louis von Ahn, co -founder and CEO, took LinkedIn On Thursday, to walk in a previous position, artificial intelligence pushes human employees.
“To be clear: I do not see Amnesty International to replace what our employees do (we are actually continuing to use it at the same speed as it was),” books. “I see it as a tool to accelerate what we do, at the same level or better than quality. The more we learn how to use it, and use it responsible, the better in the long run.”
He added: “No one is expected to move on this transition on its own. We develop workshops and consulting councils, and we grant time a dedicated experience to help all of our teams learn and adapt.”
The clarification is a 180 -degree turn of the company’s position A. A week agoWhen she announced that she “will gradually stop using contractors to do the work that artificial intelligence can deal with”, evaluate the fluency of artificial intelligence in the annual reviews of workers, and add new employees only “if the team is not able to run more of their work.”
Von Ahn seems to throw his weight behind artificial intelligence on human teachers in the appearance of podcasts. Speak on No screaming With Sarah Qouh, he expected artificial intelligence to be able to teach any topic, on a broader scale, and create “better educational results” than human teachers, but added that schools will continue to exist “because you still need to care for children.”
Criticism flew. The famous tiktok of the company and Instagram Accounts, commentators accumulated on Bash AI in every modern post. (On one video Where I asked the most luxurious child’s owl, “Mama, may I get a cookie file”, the higher comment reads: “Mama, may I have real people run the company”) TikhakIn contrast to a convincing person wearing Hoody to explain that “artificial intelligence will allow us to reach more people.”
A spokesman for Dolingo said luck: “We are still growing our team, and we are training and developing our talents so that they can benefit from the use of artificial intelligence.” He added: “All the content of artificial intelligence is created under the supervision and guidance of our learning experts. We have strict quality standards to ensure that any content published is safe, accurate and in line with CEFR”, with reference to the international standard to measure language capacity.
Emerging companies curb their enthusiasm
Duolingo’s self -correction is the latest in a modern direction.
It was Fintech Klarana on artificial intelligence last month. After publicly promoted Chatbot from artificial intelligence, saying that she did not employ humans per year, CEO of the company open The “low quality” of Chatbot means that it will start employing people again after all.
Shopify He faced similar criticism after a note He mainly said that the productivity of artificial intelligence will replace new appointments.
Duolingo’s reverse reaction is the latest evidence that “AI-FIRST” tends to be more understandable with more attractiveness for investors and managers more than most ordinary people. It is not difficult to know the reason. Tructured artificial intelligence is often trained in the content content that may be It has been reached illegally; A large part of its production is strange or incorrect; And some leaders in this field Opposition For technology regulations.
But outside the outlets designated at work with white collars for beginners, the productivity of artificial intelligence has not yet been achieved. and IBM A survey of 2000 commanders found that 3 out of 4 Amnesty International initiatives Hand over Returning the promised them. The recent National Economic Research Office of the Economic Research Office found 25,000 workers in the industries exposed to the family organization that this technology did not make workers significantly more productive and had no impact on Profits as well as watches.
“This tool that was adopted very quickly, as the expectations were very high, (did not) make a difference in profits,” said Anders Hamiltom, professor of economics at the University of Chicago, one of the authors of the NBR study. luck.
“It seems much smaller and slower than you might imagine that you have just studied technology capabilities in a vacuum.”
This story was originally shown on Fortune.com
https://fortune.com/img-assets/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/GettyImages-2215933319-e1748035183691.jpg?resize=1200,600
Source link