The box office is proven that Hollywood needs to listen to the masses

by Dru diet
| Published 3 seconds ago

Now this arms I have succeeded in the box office – don’t worry, we’ll start entering the numbers and comparisons a little for all your data operations – it’s time for everyone to start announcing the reason for doing it well. There are boring answers such as a strongly designed and widespread marketing campaign, but what I think is really worth focusing on my discussion about the audience’s response to the film.

Because many people did not appear only arms The first place in the box office, and it seems that they loved the movie a little. I did so (Evaluation) And more than the fuel of the fire that burns in the movie theater this year.

The audience wants original stories led by bold movie makers.

arms Bookness statistics

Let’s get out of this road: arms The box office topped with a more expected distance of $ 42.5 million. This is impressive given that he played on more than 700 screens less than its opening competitor, Terrible. Nobody expects ever expects to complete the long comedy victory armsBut it is difficult to deny that the joint Zach Cregger has excessive performance and a larger share of the eyes fell more than the most optimistic projections that he would have believed. Just to give you some numbers to format, Terrible It has been operated on less than 4000 screens (3975 is the amount reported) and an average of $ 7295 per screen. arms It played on 3202 screens and an average of 13,272 dollars per screen.

As statistics go, arms He is the winner. But statistics are less interesting and deserve to focus on how the masses respond arms.

The audience wants what is unexpected

arms Don’t just look good through the box office numbers. Cinemascore fans gave a medium twisted horror puzzle. Anything in Domain A is an indication of the reliable positive responses in Cinemascore, but it seems that the same is reflected in Spoiled tomatoes The ratio of the audience. Until this writing, it has an 87 % audience degree.

Warner Bruce is on a roll with the amazing film manufacturing bank/director/creative creativity this year with arms and Singer. So, it’s time to acknowledge a major factor in the successes of these two films: they were something that the audience did not expect. It was not based on any direct source material or a well -known property. Instead, it was original ideas from the writer who allowed a great budget but not bankers to make the movie they want to make.

This is the lesson that studios need to stay away from arms and Singer Because the box office proves this. Yes, there will always be a place for you Supermansand Fantastic Foursand Fast and angryES, but it is clear that the masses (especially the smaller population composition) want to be surprised in a movie from A to Z.

I am very pleased with the audience, responding to him arms He gave her a box office weekend worth celebrating. Horror has always been reliable with the masses, and it is great to see more unique sounds like Zach Cregger’s Calle to a Hungry Ground. Here in the hope of the studio’s response is to find and support more creative film makers instead of, “Zach! What Catcha Got for Weapons 2? “

---