The birth of the Global Jorani finds a sudden new meaning for the concession dinosaurs

In the movie “Juerasic Park” by Stephen Spielberg in 1993, the billionaire behind hopeful gravity, John Hammond (Richard Attenburo), is practically exploding with tin expectations of the success of his project. He wanders that his team that helped restore dozens of extinct species of dinosaurs to life “spared no account”, and that everything in the garden includes “very amazing designs.” Although the small group of experts invited Hammond to tour the garden, they have already admired what he did, they have strong emotional responses to the actual living dinosaurs scenes that walk on the ground, they start to have serious doubts that scientists start. He should.”

“Juerasic Park”, both the first movie and the source of the source of Michael Crichton, uses the idea of ​​a potential dinosaur entertainment park as a metaphor for all kinds of observers surrounding science and technology, especially the tendency of humanity to jump before its appearance. It is part of Mary Shellley, “Westworld”, “King Kong”, and not only the film became a great success, but has become a great success, but Help consolidate the use of images created in the computer in the cinema. Just a few years later, CGI has become an essential element in almost every type of type, with great developments and technology improvements that occur with every year that passes.

However, as Claire Dering (Price Dallas Howard) explains in the “World of Jorsi”, the audience’s appetite for more things and the best is not flawed. While the “Jurassic” privilege took a number of conceptual turns and added many new characters to this mix (not to mention the Dino or two new shows with each supplement), there is no doubt that the tremendous interest and love that the first movie obtained has retreated. It seems that the last input, “Jurassic World Rebirth”, recognizes thisComparatively compared to slow extinction of dinosaurs that are born again to the crawling of the cinema industry. Ironically, in both cases, we have a “Jurassic Park” to partially blame.

The construction of the world in a “new birth” from the “former Jurassic World” trilogy, which was made by the writer/director Kulin Trevoro and his collaborators. In these films, the genetic designed dinosaurs were originally launched by the deserted Marmons on the island of Izla Surna, and the subsequent global Al -Jawrasi resort was finally launched on the entire planet. For some time, these creatures seem to coexist with humans and other animals. It seems that the trilogy was carrying a central metaphor for the dinose that Spielberg started with “The Lost World: Jurassic Park”, which is that it is a list of animals and the natural world in general. Films called for general preservation and preservation of dinosaurs, with the theory of chaos in Malcolm clearly in the way the whole world has now been forced at the expense of these new species.

“A new birth” adds new wrinkles to all of thisWhile the writer David Kweib begins the crawl of a title that shows that the majority of dinosaurs have started to die since the events of “Dominion”. Creatures now give in many differences in the modern climate of the Earth from the prehistoric climate that they originally used to (HG Wells Plot Point ” “The World War”, one of them adapted by Koepp and Spielberg in 2005). Although dinosaurs are still able to live in areas close to the equator on the ground (which simulates its traditional climate soon enough to allow them to prosper), the decline of the dinos has become more tragic and sharp because the public interest in it has now faded after the whole world has become accustomed to their existence. The opening sequence of the film shows how Brachiosaurus, which was the source of awe to Alan Grant (Sam Nil) and Elie Sater (Laura Dern), became just a danger to the crossbar that causes traffic congestion.

It is a skilled visual metaphor on behalf of Koepp and director Gareth Edwards, a good image like reference to what was previously exciting and the novel became common for homogeneous fans. Along with the lament of Dr. Henry Lomis (Jonathan Billy), the attendance at the History Museum has decreased severely, Koepp and Edwards are not hidden about how these dinosaurs in visual effects in species films, if not in general, in general. Recently, there has been a lot of discussion about how films have become less than clouds for public masses, and although there are many social and economic reasons for this, Edwards and Koepp properly determined the saturation of movies visual effects and standing everywhere as one major factor. How can any audience fill in dread and wonder again when they are trained in decades of films where the effects are, they are likely to be in the minds of the normal scenes, made of the apparent pressure of some buttons?

Of course, there are no visual effect films that are simply made such a traditional wisdom that you will get. Part of the problem is our lack of common language When discussing visual effectsAnd therefore the result of non -issues such as “CGI looks good/bad” to become the high debate about them. Another problem in facing visual effects is that, despite the amount of effort and great creativity that enters into their construction, many managers and producers have the mentality “Let’s do it in the Post.” It is a crutch that has led to some classic techniques for deception photography and other delusions of the hand that is ignored or forgotten, such as My discussion with David F. Sandberg about using these devices on “until dawn”. All this contributed to the lack of increased indifference to the visions that the cinema can provide, which only exacerbates a study of the history of the movie. Edwards himself also said to the deadline for the red carpet of “new birth”, Most films that he considers masterpieces made before the original “Jurassic Park”, indicating that technological progress is not necessarily improved.

As such, Edwards and Koepp uses “Juerasic World Rebirth” to try to make a case of how visual effects can withstand the ability to enjoy, entertain and excite in the only way they know: using Cinematic Craft. “A new birth” is not a way to circumvent. It is not characterized by a kind of new processes or technology that appears, nor does it try to trade the nostalgia to the past by using only mobile effects or process. (Actually, it looks like that “Birth” has no practical dinosaurs, which is a noticeable difference from each previous movie “Jurassic”. Instead, the film depends on providing a real feeling of size, risks and suspense, as the visual effects are not amazing, but the circumstances surrounding them and their display. During the previous condition of the film, “Someone sees a benign and scene dinosaur”, “Rebirth” did something I thought it was impossible: he made me emotional, and I planted this feeling of wonder that I thought had finished these films. All this is due to the way Edwards calls the scene, the way VFX artists offer the animation of dinosaurs, and the way Pelly plays this moment. It is, in short, the magic of filmmaking at work.

It is clear that this is not enough for everyone, as the most hostile reactions indicate a “new birth”. For these people, familiarity seems to have already been born with contempt, because they refuse another “Jurassic” supplement. Although good, pure filmmaking is sufficient for me and it seems that it is the only way to move forward in “Jurassic” films if they continue, there is no doubt that future film makers should respond to “Rebirth” warnings when it comes to visual effects. If we are not careful, then the excitement of movies can actually die, and this is a way that no one should hope to become extinct.