The best new edition of the live Disney work, according to corrupt tomatoes

In 2010, Disney recorded In unexpected great success with “Alice in Wonderland” by Tim Burton, “ A film costs 200 million dollars, but it has never been more than one billion dollars worldwide. I say “incomprehensible” because the film was not well loved by critics; It is currently carrying a 51 % unnecessary approval rating Spoiled tomatoes. Although he had the same title as the 1951 animated movie from Disney, “Alice in Wonderland”, he was more than a complement from a new edition, after Alice (Mia and Asikovsa) returned to Wonderland after it became an adult. There, I found that the fictional kingdom was divided by war and violence, which prompted it to be a suit of shields and take a sword to make matters in its right quorum.

Disney reshaped some of her animated films by (“The Jungle Book” in 1994, “101 Dalmatians” in 1996), but “ALICE” entered a new direction for the studio. For the 15 -year -old, Disney has brought back its own properties with pointed aggression, and theaters that accommodate with a large number of nostalgia to nostalgia. Some films in this direction were a re -examination of the familiar characters (“” “” “Crueella”), while others were explicitly bound to the extent of re -use of the same songs, such as “” The Jungle Book “,” Beauty and The Beast “,” The Little Mermaid “and” The Lion King ” “Snow White”. These films were mostly successful, even if most of the fans are creating creatively.

More importantly, all these Disney reshaping operations took elements, personal designs and conspiracies of the animated features that inspired it, ensuring that Disney, the company, still has absolute mastery of these stories. In fact, the mouse house insists on controlling the “virtual” version of some fairy tales, even those that come from folklore or literature. Re -restarting the cognitive “royal” of the studio.

In terms of quality, re -formation operations were mixed at best. However, at least corrupt tomatoes can direct us to the films that critics have received more hot.

From writing these lines, the 2016 “The Jungle Book” movie is the best new version of Disney Live-Action reviewed, with a 94 % approval classification. The movie, of course, but it is one of the many modifications for the Rudyard Kipling Adventure of 1894 with the same name. But, in fact, it is a new version of the Disney -released Wolfgang Reheger Ritger -released air conditioning. In the coup of special effects, the largest part of “The Jungle Book” is moved, with modern animal characters and most backgrounds are CGI. The only living element is the Mwgli, which is played by Neel Sethi. A group of celebrities also expressed animal figures, including Ben Kings in the role of Bayjira, Idris Elba in the role of Sherry Khan, Scarlett Johansson in the role of Ka, Crystone Walkin in the role of King Louis, and Bill Murray in the role of Palo.

Critics praised the Favrio movie because of his photos, as well as finding it that he was more thoughtful and meaningful than the 1967 animation that inspired him. Anthony Lin in New Yorker One of the rare critics was on the pretext that the impressive images were in the service of advanced technology and did not communicate with the story or humanity very well.

Favreau will use a similar approach to comprehensive special effects when he reshaped “The Lion King” in 1994 in 2019.Except, literally, one live shotShe also used the same songs as its predecessor. The result was less receiving, as the realistic lions were unreasonable; They looked too much Like real animals. What’s more, “The Lion King” is one of the worst films reviewed in the direction of Disney Remik, wearing a 52 % rating on spoiled tomatoes. However, it was a larger blow than “Alice in Wonderland”, where she got 1.66 billion dollars at the box office. Prior to the title “Mufasa: The Lion King” in 2024.

The second highest rate of approval of a new edition of Disney on the spoiled tomatoes for the 2016 “PETE’s Dragon”, which was directed by David Lowry and carries a 88 % rating on the basis of 244 reviews. It also stands regardless of other studio re -operations because “Pete’s Dragon” is amazingly different from its predecessor, as it has followed a more realistic approach to the material. Even after that Kenneth Branagh’s Redux 2015 from Cinderella, That has an 84 % approval rate and actually disturbed the embodiment of his story in interesting ways. It is worth noting that the wife of the evil father (Kate Blanchett) was given a sympathetic background story that made her feel more tragic (but not so sympathetic that she was not evil).

Sitting in the fourth place in the list is Stephen Somers’s direct 1994 adaptation to “The Jungle Book”, which bears the approval of 80 %. However, this film was not heard again to Disney in 1967 moving; It was just a new explanation for the original Kipling story. This leads us to “Cruella”, the fifth new edition of Disney classified in the classification and only one personality study in the best characters directed by Craig Gilbeis. The 2021 movie was based on a strange idea in terms of aspiring to create a complex and heavy background for the legend of Crolla de Vel (Emma Stone), a woman who only wanted to take off a handful of Dolmasian puppy to make a fur coat in “one hundred and one of the Dalma”.

We skipped down the list, our “Pinocchio” from Robert Zimikis, who poured a lot of money in a vital movie and CGI regeneration for the 1940 Disney movie, was not unknown and visually busy, which gets a 27 % approval rating. It has been ranked less than a hundred and one of the 1996 Dalmatians, “101 Dalmatians”, a living movie that starred in the wonderful Glenn in the like Cruella de Vil.