The authors publish Tiktoks to protest against the use of artificial intelligence in writing – and to demonstrate that they do not do that

Godschild, who formulated the fictional novel Hunter and hunting, She says she was writing from childhood and going through a lengthy process – destroying her manuscript years before putting the pen on paper. A few days after seeing a 1000 -page Aveyard editing publication, Godschild published a time period for herself writing on her computer, Video clarification, “Watch this interval in which I write a scene on a TV program for the mystery of the murder without using Gen-Ei.” The explanatory name also notes that it is “not a thief” and that “the killer cannot be predicted, not even the machine can know who it is.”

Some writers use artificial intelligence controversy to remind people of the same human skills to formulate a complex story.

O author of Endy Rachel Minard Post Tiktok From itself, one of its manuscripts is opened, and she wrote that if she uses artificial intelligence, “it will not take 78 drafts to accomplish.”

“Everyone has forgotten what makes a good book, the work it is going through,” says Minard, who formulated three books independently. She adds that although artificial intelligence may be able to “get out of the decent spice scene”, it cannot create a convincing story. “If my characters do not feel real people, living a real life, with real problems, I need to continue working on them.”

Quan Millz, Indy author With more than 830,000 Tikhak following He is known for his “Mumbered Street” nicknames in the jaw The old Tottout and This shovel got cockroaches in her bedHe says accusations that he used Amnesty International Writing that goes beyond his description as a thief – it reduces the cultural fluency behind his novels. Before revealing his identity on Tiktok in 2023, Millz, a black, dealt with accusations that he was white and even rumors that he was a “CIA worker”.

“It is now clear that you are using Amnesty International to write all your books. There is no way to drop these books quickly,” One commentator wrote On one of Mills posts.

Millz uses Amnesty International to create bookwalks, including books that are still in the conceptual stage, but it says allegations that he is also writing with the tool is wrong.

“There is no way to hell that you will get any of these artificial intelligence models to capture the essence of how black speaks,” Mills told Wire. The author says he tested him using the artificial intelligence of writing and found that large language models are subject to the control of his extreme scenes and could not reproduce his fine accent. “It does not understand that AAVE (American English) is not homogeneous … Black does not look like Chicago like blacks in New York.”

While Millz hosted a couple of Tiktok’s life to document the actual writing process, Wire he will not host more – even if it helps to prove that his written work is original.

He says that verifying constantly with commentators hindered his writing process, and he feels that although there is a social existence it is very important in independent publishing, depicting your process will not provide evidence of artificial intelligence-free work-at least not yet. “I really think there is something other than the human experience, which is a mystical thing that we do not know yet, and you can feel that it is through the arts,” Mills says. “When you read the text of artificial intelligence, even if you do a good job trying to edit it or make it your own, there is still something wrong.”