The applicant calls for the startup for the shadows, the company responds to examining the background, “failure as a person”

We soon supports the general opening of technology professionals about the alleged shadows in an inverse emerging company after the company’s co -founder returned with receipts, which caused a severe discussion about the employment of morals and behavior online.

It started when Ravi Kumar moved to X to accuse a startup to ignore emails to follow up after an interview. In response to a publication by the co -founder to start operating, PRATHAM GROVER, Kumar claimed that the candidates did not get appropriate updates and said: “If you are employing to start operating and do not respond to the emails of the applicants, this is a fraud.”

But the conversation took a sharp turn. He answered a graof, and revealed that Kumar did not wipe the interview or verify the background. In an explicit publication, he wrote, “Hello Ravi, I failed in the interview, a sign was marked while checking the background, and was exposed as an expert of hate women. He also failed as a decent human. No surprises here. Cheers, the employment team.”

Grover attached screenshots of the old Kumar posts, including one as he rejected women’s concern about internal training by telling her “marriage” and “family management”. Other tweets included rags about the recruitment process and complaints about automatic rejection.

The dispute sparked strong reactions on the Internet. Some users sympathized with Kumar’s frustration with the lack of reactions, while others felt that Grover Clapback was justifying him. “Why was a rear examination needed for a failure candidate in the interview?” He asked one user.

Another user, which reflects similar feelings, said, “I wonder how I fell here but somewhat scary. Twitter shots are pulled to check the background. Is this standard procedure?

Another, “It is definitely a smart step to check for Twitter profiles. It can reveal a lot about someone.”