The American Public Prosecutor orders the sessions of the major jury sessions on the Trump probe Russia

US Prosecutor Bam Bondi ordered the prosecutors to open legal procedures in allegations that Donald Trump’s political opponents may conspire falsely accusing him of collusion with Russia in the period before the 2016 presidential elections.

According to BBC’s CBS News partner, General Prosecutors will provide evidence in the form of a major jury – a group of audience members who will decide whether the official charges will be presented.

However, it is unclear what these accusations may be and who can be charged.

Trump was elected head of the 2016 elections, overcoming democratic candidate Hillary Clinton. He has always accused the sun’s opponents of the sun over the so -called Russia’s allegations.

Last month, the American director of national intelligence, Toulcy Gabbard, accused President Barack Obama and his national security team “for a period of years” against Trump.

Gabbard claimed that intelligence is about Russian intervention was politicized in the 2016 White House elections With the White House, Obama is falsely connecting Trump to Russia.

Trump’s reaction to Obama’s accusation of “betrayal” – Obama’s spokesman called for this claim “strange”.

Democrats did not say anything in Gabbard’s results to nullify American intelligence Evaluation in January 2017 He concluded that Russia sought to harm Clinton’s campaign and strengthen Trump in voting three months ago.

Report of the two parties 2020 By the Senate Intelligence Committee, Russia has tried to help the Trump campaign for the year 2016.

Fox News reported last month that former CIA manager John Brennan and former FBI director James Komei were undergoing criminal investigation regarding Trump’s investigation of Russia. Both of them have long denied any violations and accusing Trump of sabotaging the judicial system.

The first half of Trump’s presidency was overwhelmed by an investigation from his Ministry of Justice if he had conspired with Russia for the impact of the results of 2016.

The resulting MUELLER report did not find any evidence that Trump or his campaign was coordinated with the Kremlin, and no one was accused of these crimes.

The discussion was re -activated about Russiaagate last week when the basket was raised from the appendix to another investigation into the Ministry of Justice in the case.

29 pages From the inquiry of Special Adviser John Durham, citing the March 2016 memo from the US intelligence source that Hillary Clinton has agreed to a plan to pollute Trump as a Russian origin.

Durham cite “What seems or claims to be original email messages” that mids of Russian intelligence may have obtained an employee with a non -profit organization run by the liberal donor George Soros.

It seems that one of the messages was sent by Leonard Pinardo, the first vice president in the foundations of open society, Soros’s charitable arm. He appears to refer to Foreign Policy Adviser Clinton, Juliana Smith.

“Jolie says it will be a long -term relationship to clarify Putin and Trump. Now it is good to bounce after the bounce. At a later time, the FBI will put more oil in the fire.”

There is nothing illegal about political distortion, but Trump’s allies suggested that the email, if it was real, showed that federal investigators could have been part of the scheme. Durham, however, found no evidence of the FBI plot.

According to the annex, Benardo Durham told “the best of what he remembers”, he did not describe the email, although he indicated that some of the insult seemed to be something he would have said.

The Special Adviser also conducted an interview with Smith, who said she did not remember receiving such an email from Pinardo.

Durham did not make any decision to append whether emails are authentic, or if the Russian spies had been doctoral.

But Omar Waraish, director of open community institutions, told the BBC in Benardo emails were “counterfeit raw”.

“The allegations that the open society helped organize the investigation of the FBI is noticeable and wrong,” A statement from non -profit organizations He said.

The 306 -page Durham’s main report, published in 2023, found that the original investigation office of the Trump Campaign lacks “analytical rigor” and relied on “raw intelligence, not calculated and unacceptable.”

US officials found that the Russian intervention in 2016 included BOT farms on social media and the penetration of democratic emails, but they finally concluded that the impact may have been limited and has not already changed the outcome of the elections.