The American judge says that the effort to deport Mahmoud Khalil is probably unconstitutional Courts News

A federal judge said to the United States that efforts by the administration of President Donald Trump to deport a student supporter of Palestine Mahmoud Khalil It is likely to be unconstitutional.

Boycott judge Michael Varbarars from New Jersey wrote on Wednesday that the government’s claim that Khalil was a threat to American national security, and foreign policy was not likely to succeed.

“Does the average person have a feeling that it can be removed from the United States because he” waives the “American” American interests ” – that is, because it led to the exposure of the United States with other countries – when the Secretary did not decide that his actions affected the United States’ relations with a foreign country?” Farbiarz books. “Maybe not.”

Farbiarz immediately did not rule whether the rights of Khalil’s first amendment to freedom of expression were violated. He also did not order the immediate release of Khalil, pointing to unanswered questions about his permanent residence request.

The judge is expected to order other steps in the coming days.

The ruling against the government will be the last legal setback for the controversial Trump administration’s efforts Shout On the pro -Palestine activity throughout the United States in the name of national security and combating anti -Semitism.

But critics accused the Trump administration of the basic violation Constitutional rights In her efforts to do so.

Khalil, a permanent legal resident in the United States, was the first high -level detention held in the Trump administration’s batch to expel the demonstrators participating in demonstrations against the Israel war in Gaza.

Khalil, a former graduate student, worked as a spokesman for the war -anti -war protests at Columbia University. But on March 8, the 30 -year -old was arrested in the Housing Building Hall in New York City, while his wife, Dr. Nour Abdel -Ala, was photographed.

He was then transferred from a detention center in New Jersey to one in Gina, Louisiana, while his lawyers struggled to confirm his position. He is still imprisoned at the Gina facility while the US government is seeking to deport it.

In general data, Khalil said that his detention is part of an attempt to relax the United States’ support for the Israeli war, which was It is described as genocide By human rights groups and United Nations experts.

Civil freedom organizations also expressed their warning that Khalil’s detention appears on his political views, rather than any criminal acts. Khalil was not accused of any crime.

In Louisiana, Khalil continues a tight confrontation of his deportation. But in a separate case before the US Federal Court in Newark, New Jersey, Khalil’s lawyers argue in a petition in the court: in other words, a case that argues that their client illegally seized.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who behaves on behalf of the Trump administration, referred to the 1952 immigration and immigration law as a legal basis for the arrest of Khalil.

The cold war era states that the Foreign Minister can deport a foreign citizen if this person is considered “severe consequences for harmful foreign policy.”

However, this law has rarely used and concerns about conflicts with the first amendment to the American constitution, which guarantees the right to freedom of expression regardless of nationality.

Judge Varbarars seems to be frequenting this anxiety, and he warned that the logical basis of the Trump administration seemed to fulfill the standards of “constitutional ambiguity”.

This, in turn, means that the contact with Khalil “is likely to succeed in the advantages of his claim” that the government’s actions were unconstitutional, as the judge wrote on Wednesday.

Khalil’s legal team praised the judge’s order, and wrote in a statement after that, “The provincial court has already known what we have already known: The minister’s weapon is likely to be the Immigration Law to punish Mahmoud and others like him unconstitutional.”

Khalil is one of the many prominent students whose issues have tested the constitutional limits of the Trump administration’s actions.

Other international students have been detained for their involvement in the pro -events policy, such as the student of Tafs University Truth Oztuk He demanded the University of Colombia Mohsen MahdawiThey were released from detention after the legal challenges.

But Khalil is still in detention. the government Refuse the request To issue the temporary Khalil, who would have allowed him to see the birth of his son in April.

He also sought to prevent him from carrying his new baby during the visit sessions at the Louisiana detention center.

“I am angry at cruelty and inhumane this system that dares to name himself only,” said Khalil’s wife, in a statement.

She pointed out that the enforcement of immigration and customs (ICE) denied the family, “This is the basic human right” after it flew more than 1000 miles to visit it in Louisiana with her new baby.

A judge prevented these efforts made by ICE last week, allowing Khaled to carry his son for the first time more than a month after his birth.