The administration of President Donald Trump continued to face setbacks in its attempts to deport the demonstrators, who support the Palestinians, as the courts were investigating whether the rights of students have violated.
On Wednesday, separate courts issued orders related to two of the most prominent cases: Mahmoud Khalil and Truth Oztuk.
In New York, the American Court of Appeal in the second circle ordered by Oztuk, a 30 -year -old Turkish student from Tuffs University, ordered to Vermont no later than May 14.
This ruling was the rejection of the Trump administration’s call to delay the transportation and the preservation of Ozturk in Louisiana, where it was detained at the Immigration Detention Center since late March.
“We are grateful because the court refused the government’s attempt to maintain its isolation from its community and its legal lawyer while continuing its case to release it,” said Ishha Bahandari, a lawyer in the American Civil Liberties Union, which represents Ozturk.
Separately, in Newark, New Jersey, a federal judge in the Trump administration ordered details about its logic to describe Khalil, the leading company in student protests at Columbia University, as a threat to American foreign policy.
Inside the case of Ozturk
The latest judgment in Ozturk case The most prominent practice that has become common under the Trump administration: Many foreign students participating in the pro -Palestinian protest movement have been transferred to detention centers away from their homes.
The ordeal of Oztuk began on March 25, when six police officers arrested her with a clear suitability outside her home in a Boston suburb, Massachusetts, where she went to school.
Supporters believe that Oztuk, a PhD student and a Volibright researcher from Turkiye, was directed to write an opinion article in her student newspaper, and called Tuffs University to recognize the Israeli war on Gaza as a collective genocide.
The United States is a long ally of Israel and supported its military campaign in Gaza. The Trump administration accused Ozturk of “engaging in activities to support Hamas, a foreign terrorist organization enjoying the killing of Americans,” although it has not provided evidence.
After being detained outside her home, it was said that Ozturk was transferred across the country’s borders, first to Vermont and then to Louisiana, all within 24 hours, according to her lawyers.
Critics described these quick transfers as a way to sabotage legal procedures, and to separate foreign students from family, friends and legal resources that they can benefit from.
In the Ozturk case, the confusion led her lawyer to submit a petition for her release in Massachusetts, because they did not know where they were when they presented the papers.
On April 18, the minimum court ruled that Ozturk must be returned to Vermont no later than May 1, because it weighed a petition in Ybeas: a kind of complaint that defies the legitimacy of the individual’s detention.
“No one should be arrested and closed to his political views. Every day, Romisa Ozturk remains in detention, it is a very long day,” Bhandari, her lawyer, said in a statement.
But the Trump administration has resumed, seeking an emergency residence to transfer Ozturk to Vermont.
The Court of Appeal rejected in the second circle (Pdf(This request, however. She said that the government failed to show any “irreplaceable damage” that Ozturk’s transfer would be performed.
The court wrote: “In the face of such a conflict between the financial and administrative concerns that are not specific to the government on the one hand, and the risk of major constitutional damage to Oza on the other hand, we do not conclude a little difficulty in concluding the” balance of difficulties “definitely in its favor.”
Although Ozturk is expected to be transferred to Vermont, where the seam will be heard in Ybeas, the Trump administration is scheduled to continue the deportation procedures in Louisiana.
However, the Court of Appeal clarified that this should not be a challenge to the Trump administration, given that Ozturk can be represented through the video conference of these listening sessions.
The court wrote: “The government confirms that the matter will face difficulties in arranging the emergence of Ozturk for its remote migration in Louisiana.” “But the government has not contested that it is legally possible and in practice to attend the remote removal removal procedures.”
The Trump administration has the option to appeal the Supreme Court decision.
Inside the case of Khalil
Likewise, Khalil faces the deportation procedures in Louisiana while his seam is heard in New Jersey, closer to his home in New York City.
On March 8, he became the first high -level condition of the arrested student protesters on charges of deportation. Agents to enforce immigration and customs arrived at the housing building for students at Columbia University, where his wife, an American citizen, photographed and led him.
Khalil himself was a permanent resident in the United States recently graduated from the College of International Affairs in Colombia. It is of Palestinian origin.
On Tuesday, the Court of Appeal in the third district of New Jersey rejected an offer from the Trump administration to transfer a petition for Khalail to Louisiana.
On Wednesday, the US District Court Judge Michael Varbarars ordered the Trump administration to provide a specific evaluation of the risks faced by Khalil by being in the United States.
Trump’s Foreign Minister Marco Rubio was martyred for the 1952 immigration and nationality law to justify the detention of Khalil and his deportation. The rule of the law used rarely allows state secretarms to remove non -citizens who can cause “severe consequences in dangerous foreign policy.”
But Rubio has been mysterious so far about what these consequences might have in the case of Khalil. The protest leader was accused of students without any crime.
Judge Farbaraz also asked Trump team to present a catalog for every case used by US officials in this law. The Trump administration is expected to resume the judge’s order as well.
https://www.aljazeera.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/AP25127569976092-1746646220.jpg?resize=1200%2C630
Source link