The American Court prevents the Texas Law, which requires ten commandments in classrooms schools Education News

The United States’ Judge gave a temporary bloc against the Texas Law, which requires the presentation of the ten commandments of the Christian Bible in the classroom in each public school.

On Wednesday, the American boycott judge, Farid Perry, issued a preliminary order against the Senate Bill in the Senate in Texas, which was scheduled to enter into force on September 1.

Texas would have become the largest state to impose such a condition on public schools.

But Judge Perry’s decision is in line with two other decisions of the court during the past month: one in Arkansas and one in Louisiana, both of which are the ruling of such laws unconstitutional.

Biery’s decision opens by referring to the first amendment to the United States constitution, which prevents the government from passing laws “respecting the creation of religion”. This item supports the separation of the church and the state in the United States.

Then the judge argues that even the “negative” offers of the ten wills would risk pumping religious discourse into the semester, and thus violating this separation.

“Although the Ten Commandments will not be taught positively, the captive audience is likely to have questions, which the teachers will feel forced to answer. This is what they do,” Perry wrote.

“Adolescent children may ask, as they are the curious hormonal creatures on which they are:“ Mrs. Walker, I know about lying and I love my father, but how do I do fornication? “Really an embarrassing moment for teachers who have high ages and wages, and who have already have to deal with sexual education issues.”

However, Biery’s decision applies only to 11 school areas represented between the defendants, including Alamo Heights, Houston, Austin, Fort Bend and Plano.

The case arose from a complaint filed by many parents of school age, which represented groups including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the United Americans to separate the church and the state.

One of the prosecutors was a rabbi in San Antonio, Mara Nathan, who felt the copy of the ten commandments scheduled to be shown in contrast to the Jewish teachings. She praised that he is a judicial on Wednesday in A. statement Released by ACLU.

Nathan said: “The religious beliefs of children must be instilled by parents and religious societies, not politicians and public schools,” Nathan said.

Among the other prosecutors was the Christian families who feared the school’s performances would lead to the ten wills to teach religious interpretations and concepts that they might object to.

However, the Texas state government argued that the ten wills symbolize an important part of American culture, and thus should be a mandatory presence in schools.

“The ten commandments are the cornerstone of our moral and legal heritage, and its presence in the classroom is a reminder of the values that direct the responsible citizenship,” Ken Buckston, the Texas Public Prosecutor, said in a statement. He pledged to appeal Wednesday’s ruling.

But in his 55-page decision, Judge Perry, who was appointed by Democratic President Bill Clinton in 1994, drew a group of cultural references-from the Christian Bible to the seventies pop duo Sony and Sho and actress Greta Garpo-drawing a history of the risk of imposing religion on the public.

“It is possible that the offers are likely to pressure viewers in religious commitment, meditation, reverence and adoption of the preferred religious Bible of the state,” Berry wrote at some point.

He also said that such offers were “suppressing (children), religious or non -religious backgrounds and beliefs during school.”

Biery has offered even the personal story to clarify the authority that governments can keep in adopting religion.

“In fact, forty years ago, Methoditi’s preacher told a younger judge at the time,” Farid, if you were born in Tibet, you will be Buddhi, “Berry wrote.

The separate federal issue that includes Dallas Schools also challenge the requirements of the ten will. The Texas Education Agency is called as a defendant.

Such cases will eventually reach the Supreme Court, which currently has six to three conservative wings and showed sympathy for religious presentations.

In the case of 2022, Kennedy County against Bremerton, for example, the Supreme Court stood with a football coach in high schools who argued that he had the right to obtain post -match prayers, despite fears that these practices could violate the first amendment. The coach was shot for his actions.

Judge Perry concluded a decision on Wednesday with a gesture to the controversy of such cases. But he appealed to common understanding with prosperity, such as prayer.

“For those who disagree with the court’s decision and who will do this with threats, coexistence, violence, grace and peace for you,” Perry wrote. “Humanity may be reconciled from all religions and beliefs and lack of belief in each other. Amen.”