The alleged drug supplier in Didi, Brendan Paul, to testify in the trial of sex trafficking

Jurors Sean “Didi” Combs The federal trial will hear from a close ally of rapper when the former basketball player at Sri Lawsez Brendan Paul takes the situation on Friday.

Paul became involved in Dent’s legal drama in April 2024, after he was named in a lawsuit filed by Rodney “Lille Road” against the disgraceful Mongols. The music producer claimed that Paul worked a “mule” for mothers, buying and distributing “drugs and guns”. The basketball star in the former college was then accused of having a cocaine felony, which was later dropped.

Paul obtained immunity in exchange for his testimony in the trial of sex trafficking in the Federal Dide.

Nicole Blanc Baker He explained that Paul may be a decisive witness to the government because he is trying to link the loose parties and wrap his case against Didi.

Sex trafficking in Didi, the blackmail trial that was forced to delay due to the jury case

“In this particular case, why (Brendan Paul) might be important is that he claims to be one of the individuals who supply drugs,” Baker told Fox News Digital. “Distributing drugs, giving others drugs to make them drunk and may do more than they would have done if he was not drunk – this is a Musnad felony.

“In other words, in order to prove this accusation of extortion, there must be a number of other crimes that can contact,” the lawyer said. “Whether it is to coercion of women and/or refer to how … (Didi) brought (accompaniment). This is a way to prove one of the supporters.

The defense team in Didi indicates

The accusation was charged With blackmail (RICO); Sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion; Transfer to engage in prostitution in an unprecedented federal indictment on September 17.

Over the course of two weeks of certificates, jury heard allegations of the “obsessive” parties that involve male companions and his ex -girlfriend in Didi, Cassie Vinterora. “Me & U” singer that the drug, including euphoria, ketamine and cocaine, was in regular circulation during “obsessed displacement” to separate from them during the sessions.

Kassi admitted that the euphoria made her feel joy and excitement, while ketamine would make her separate. She said that cocaine made her heart race, and she made her mushrooms see things and GHB, also known as rape of history, made her feel drunk.

The last former, from He witnessed under the name “Jin”, “, I told the prosecutors that there were times when I felt coercive on the hotel’s nights with Dide and that the founder of Bad Boy Records is still paying for its legal and rent fees.

Jane recalled the alleged abuse cases during Daidi’s dating and suspended for three years until the week that was previously arrested in New York City on federal charges. Jin told the court Didi asked her about coercion after he forced her to use drugs before having sex with a male accompanying. She witnessed the alleged violent behavior of Didi and said that he once put her in suffocation after kicking and punching.

Like what you read? Click here for more entertainment news

Deedy Criminal Defense Lawyer, Tiny Girajos, asked Jane about her relationship with rapper and her participation in the alleged “hotel nights”.

Didi rent Jin pushed the “love contract”, according to her testimony. The former girlfriend told the claim that she felt that she was obligated to perform on the “hotel nights” for rapper because he threatened to stop paying the price of her house. For “Hotel Nights”, Jin claimed that she is expected to wear underwear and sex with other men in front of rapper.

The Audio that was released in the Deddy’s Sexing and Racketeing Agents included a rapper who calls the “crack tube” gene. Jin claimed that she was forced to continue having sex with several male companions after she fell ill.

Baker, who works as a defense lawyer in R. Kelly, why the government may provide immunity for the government’s testimony. In the case of sex trafficking in Didi, Paul was the fifth witness granted of immunity.

Click here to get the entertainment newsletter

Baker said: “It is very common, especially in federal cases, that immunity is given to witnesses if they have the information or insight they need in their case.” “Often, those individuals who get immunity, although they may be crimes they face or face, are usually much lower in the hierarchical sequence of crimes.

“It is usually less crimes in which the government says,” You know what, this information that this particular person enjoys is so important that we are ready to give up everything you have in the criminal section or the division now so that we can testify in this biggest case. “

Watch: Sean “Didi” Comles attack Cassi Ventura in the 2016 hotel accident

“Their goal, that is, the government, is to get a lot of possible information from anyone who knows anything.”

Nearly six weeks after the trial began, the prosecutors indicated that they would rest in their case by Friday. Judge Aaron Supramiani’s legal team recently told Judge Aaron Supramanan that he would need between two and five days to present his case, which is a blatant contradiction with his initial request for up to two weeks with witnesses on the platform.

Baker noted that there are many questions about whether the government “actually proves anything specific” for the charges that Didi faced.

Witness: A legal expert discusses difficulties in the Daidi trial

“Yes, it was there Home violence. Yes, there were some … relations and physical violence occurred, but does this rise to a level that he actually directed to him in the Federal Court? “However, I think it is over time, what does the government do?

“They raise witnesses after the witnesses. Although these individual witnesses have their own story, they together form what they are trying to form it, and this step is under P. Didddy, which is here. And these individuals, everyone has a role in what they call the institution.”

Click here to get the Fox News app

Baker said this is the relationship that the government was trying to prove to the 12 jurors.

“In a vacuum, if we have the first witness or have a gene, who has just witnessed people, I think, they will be confused, like,“ wait a moment. ”We may call him a bad friend, a bad person, a bad husband for sure, based on what we see, for example, in the video,” Baker said. “But does this rise to the level that the government needs to reach for the final ruling on guilt?

“I think, as I said, at the beginning, it was a bit defeated. However, over time, they can put them in their different witnesses and are really trying to form it, which is primarily learned, this charge from Rico in the United States. It was not initially provided for the purposes of the method that is now used.”