The $ 83 million ruling stands: The Court of Appeal describes Trump’s attacks on E. Jean Carroll as “unusual and disturbing”

A committee of three judges from the Court of Appeal in the second American district rejected Trump’s appeal for the defamation award, and found that “the prizes for the jury damage are fair and reasonable.”

The three appeals committee said: “The record in this case supports the decision of the provincial court that” the degree of extraction “of Mr. Trump’s behavior was significantly high, and maybe unprecedented. “Carroll has been subjected to constant harassment and prolific production as a result of these phrases, including many threats to kill and other threats of physical injury.”

Trump argued that the damage was unreasonable, especially the Punitive damage of $ 65 million, and was paid for a new trial in light of the expansion of the Supreme Court of Presidential Centenary.

But the Court of Appeal rejected these arguments, and wrote that Trump was “unusual and unprecedented” against Carroll, 81, justified the sharp prize.

“Given the unique and unique facts of this case, we conclude that the penalty for punitive damage did not exceed the limits of reasonableness,” the three judges committee concluded.

Trump’s lawyers did not immediately respond to an email request for comment, although they are likely to appeal the Supreme Court.

Carroll’s lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, welcomed the decision.

“Earlier today, the United States Appeal Court confirmed to the second circle, in a comprehensive 70 -page ruling, that Jean -Carroll was saying the truth, and that President Donald Trump was not so,” Kaplan said in a statement, noting that its client had received threats during the legal process and that they are

In the trial, Carroll tested that hundreds of threats were killed after Trump spoke against her. She has also lost her career career in ELLE magazine and is no longer supported in TV programs.

The referee focuses on two prizes – and is much more expensive – than two prize for defamation issued to Carroll on Trump’s -year -old attacks, which began after Trump accused in her 2019 memoirs of sexual assault on her decades ago in a store in Manhattan.

In her memoirs and again in the trial of 2023, Carroll described how the opportunity to meet with Trump on Bergdorf Goudman Fifth Street in 1996 began with Monday during shopping, then ended with a violent conflict inside the dressing room.

Carroll said Trump criticized her on the wall of the dressing room, pulled her tight dress and forced her.

In the initial trial, Trump’s jury found the responsibility for sexual assault, but it concluded that he did not commit rape as specified under the New York Law.

Trump has repeatedly denied that the meeting took place and accused Carroll of making him helping her book. He also said that Carroll “is not qualitative.”

In 2023, Carrolls gave Carol $ 5 million to compensate for both the alleged attack and the data concluded by Trump after the end of his first presidency.

After this first ruling, the court made a second trial with a new jury for a single purpose, which is to determine the damage to the data that made Trump attacked and believed the character of Carroll while he was in 2019.

Trump exceeded the first trial but attended the second, which occurred during his candidacy for the presidency in 2024.

His lawyers complained that the judge, in setting rules for the trial of damage, prevented Trump and the defense team from demanding the jury that he was innocent of the attack. The judge ruled that this case was settled by the first jury and did not need to reconsider.

In its ruling on Monday, the Court of Appeal agreed, and concluded that the trial judge “did not make mistakes in any of the rulings facing a challenge and that the prizes of the jury that were submitted according to the origins were reasonable in light of the extraordinary and radiant facts of this case.”

The second circle noted that Trump continued his attacks against Carroll for at least five years, making it “more extreme and repetitive as the trial approached.”

The Court of Appeal said: “He also continued these same attacks during the same trial.” “In one of these statements, two days of trial were issued, Trump announced that he would continue to distort Carroll” a thousand times. ”

Fortune Global Forum Returns 26 to 27 October, 2025 in Rydah. Executive chiefs and world leaders will meet for a dynamic event for the call only forms the future of business. Apply for an invitation.