Tesla “Robotaxi” and “Cybercab” road barriers before the launch of the June

Photo of author

By [email protected]


Tesla’s brand attempt was rejected the term “Robotaxi” in reference to its cars by the US Patent and brands office for being general, according to a new report. Another application of Tesla for a brand “Robotaxi” for its upcoming ride service It is still under examination By the office.

Moreover, Applications from Tesla brand has been stopped on the term “Cybercab” due to other companies that follow the brands of similar “Internet”. This includes One company This was applied to many brands related to Cybertruck accessories after selling.

USPTO Release On Tuesday, what is known as “an inconvenience office” in the “Robotaxi” brand application, which means that Tesla has three months to provide a response or that the office will give up the request. The brand lawyer, who immediately represented Tesla, did not respond to a request for comment.

Timing Applied For brands in October 2024 on the same day Cybercab revealed,, The electric car designed for this purpose and which it hopes to use one day to serve its planned independent riding. Tesla also submitted two similar requests for brands on October 10 for the term “Robobus”, which are still under examination.

The brand that was rejected to the USPTO exam was appointed on April 14. Tesla said it will use the word in reference to “(L) vehicles; electric cars, which are cars; cars and structural parts for that,” according to the original application.

While UsPTO was found that there are no conflicting brands in existence, he rejected the application because it was “just my description.” Al -Fays wrote that the term “Robotaxi” is used to describe similar goods and services by other companies.

“Uch formulation appears to be generally in the context of goods and/or services of the applicant,” Al -Faisal Books.

TECHRUNCH event

Berkeley, California
|
June 5


Book now

Tesla will be allowed to provide evidence and arguments to support her argument for the brand. If so, the USPTO wants to provide Tesla “(F) ACT papers, instructions, brochures, ads, and relevant screen shots for the applicant’s site in terms of their connection to goods and/or services in the application, including any materials that use terms in the application mark.”

In other words, Tesla needs to give specific plans to the agency for how and why the brand “Robotaxi” deserves.

Al -Faisal also wrote that Tesla will need to tell us the “competitors” use the terms “Robo, Robot or Robotic to announce goods and/or similar services.”

The other Tesla app for the “Robotaxi” brand will cover the use of the word when providing transportation services, including “coordinating travel arrangements for individuals and groups”, “arrangement of participation services in time”, and providing vehicle or rent participation. This application was also appointed for the USPTO examination on April 14, but no decision was made.

This story has been updated to include information about “Cybercab” brand applications.



https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/cybercab.png?resize=1200,556

Source link

Leave a Comment