Tesla “works to” redesign their door handles so that they are less likely to risk people inside the company’s cars, and the chief designer Franz von Holshewsen Tell Bloomberg News Wednesday.
The news comes just one day after the opening of the National Road Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) an investigation into the Tesla doors, and one week after the investigation into the Bloomberg News, the most prominent cases where the owners or passengers were stuck in their cars after a crash.
Von Holzhausen did not specify when Tesla made a decision to rethink how her door works, according to Bloomberg. China is already pushing car manufacturers to reconsider the use of fully hidden door handles due to safety concerns, although the country’s best organizer has not taken a final action.
One of the two problems appearing in the Tesla’s Doors handles was the use of electronic locks, which could stop working if they did not receive energy from the car battery system. The other is that although Tesla has a manual door versions built into its cars, it is often difficult to find and difficult to reach.
“The idea of combining electronic and the evidence together in one button, I think, very logical,” Von Holsenzen told Bloomberg. “This is something we are working on.”
NHTSA opened its investigation on Tuesday after the agency said that it had received nine complaints from Tesla owners who had failed to handle their doors. In four of these cases, Al -Salama Agency said the owners should break a window “to restore access to the car.”
Tesla includes instructions in its owner’s evidence that describes how to use an external energy source to activate the locks of dead electronic doors, as NHTSA and Bloomberg noticed. But NHTSA noticed in its initial report that none of the owners who contacted the agency reported to see low-voltage battery warnings-which means that they could not know what causes the problem.
TECHRUNCH event
San Francisco
|
27-29 October, 2025
https://techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/GettyImages-1247204574.jpg?resize=1200,702
Source link