Talks on the end of the global plastic pollution treaty with no agreement – national

He talks about a treaty to address the global crisis Plastic pollution In Geneva, it ended without an agreement on Friday, when the session was postponed with plans for an appeal at a later time.

The nations were meeting for the eleventh day in United Nations An office to try to complete a prominent treaty to end the plastic pollution crisis. They remain imposed on whether the treaty should reduce the Si growth of plastic production and put global controls legally binding on toxic chemicals used to make plastic. Most plastic is made of fossil fuels.

“We have to accept this great progress,” said Ingar Andersen, CEO of the United Nations Environment Program, despite the challenges, despite disappointment.

She said this process will not stop, but it is too early to determine the time it will take to have a treaty now.

The Youth Plastic Network for Youth was the only organization that speaks at the closing meeting on Friday. Comments from observers were cut at the request of the United States and Kuwait 24 hours after meetings and negotiation.

Negotiations at the United Nations Center were supposed to be the last round and produce the first law binding on plastic pollution, including in the oceans. But as in the meeting in South Korea last year, they leave without a treaty.

Luis Fayas Valdivizo, head of the negotiating committee, wrote two drafts of the text of the treaty in Geneva based on the views expressed by nations. Representatives of 184 countries did not agree to use either of them as a basis for their negotiations.

Valdivizo said Friday morning, as delegates in the association hall regained that there is no other procedure that is proposed at this stage in the latest draft.

Three hours after a meeting, a mill made of recycled plastic bottle peaks from the Nairobi landfill.

Representatives of Norway, Australia, Tukfalo and other countries said they are deeply disappointed to leave Geneva without a treaty. Madagascar said the world “expects to work, not reports of us.”

European Commissioner Jessica Roswal said that the European Union and his member state have higher expectations for this meeting, and while the draft is limited to their demands, this is a good basis for another negotiation session.

She said, “The Earth is only we have. We are rulers of those who come after us. Let’s deny this duty.”

The Chinese delegation said that the battle against plastic pollution is the long marathon race and that this temporary setback is a new starting point to encourage consensus. He urged countries to work together to provide future generations with a blue planet without plastic pollution.

The biggest problem with conversations was whether the treaty should impose caps on the production of new plastic or focus instead on things like the best design, recycling and reushing. The powerful countries that produce oil and gas and the plastic industry oppose the limits of production. They want a treaty that focuses on better waste management and reuse.

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia said that both drafts lack a balance, and the Saudi and Kuwaiti negotiators said that the last proposal takes the views of other countries into consideration. She consumed plastic production, which they consider out of the treaty.

This draft, which was released early on Friday, did not include an end to plastic production, but realized that the current levels of production and consumption are “not sustainable” and that there is a need for global work. A new language has been added to say that these levels go beyond the current capabilities of waste management and are expected to increase this, “and therefore requires a coordinated global response to stop and reverse these trends.”

Going now

• Why does Air Canada cancel flights before a hunger strike?

• Alberta Man’s fast journey becomes the borders of Canada and the United States as a nightmare

The target of the treaty has been renewed to mention that the agreement will be based on a comprehensive approach that addresses the full life cycle of plastic. I talked about reducing plastic products that contain “chemical or chemicals that are important to human or environment”, as well as reduce plastic products with a single or short -term use.

It was a much better and more ambitious text, albeit perfect. Magnus Hionik, the Danish Environment Minister, said that every country came to Geneva with a lot of “red lines”. Denmark holds the rotating presidency of the Council of Europe.

He said: “In order to be very clear, the settlement means that we must bend our red lines.”

For its part, Iran said it is a disappointing moment and mistaken “inappropriate and inclusive operations on unrealistic elements”, especially chemicals.

The plastic industry also urged the settlement. The global plastic trading partners said in a statement that governments should overcome the established positions to end an agreement that reflects their common priorities.

For any proposal to make it in the treaty, every nation must agree. India, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Kuwait, Vietnam and others said that the consensus is vital for an effective treaty. Some countries want to change the process until decisions are made by voting if necessary.

Graham Forbes, head of the Greenpeace delegation in Geneva, urged delegates in this direction.

“We go in circles. We cannot continue to do the same and expect a different result,” he said with the end of Friday meeting.

The international pollutant cancellation network said that what happened in Geneva showed “consensus of opinions” on the process to move forward.

On Thursday, the last day of negotiations was, but work in the revised draft continued until Friday.

Every year, the world makes more than 400 million tons of new plastic, and this may grow by about 70 percent by 2040 without changes in politics. About 100 countries want to reduce production. Many said it is also necessary to treat toxic chemicals used to make plastic materials.

Beethani Carne, Fathis, Professor of Ecological Ecology at the University of Gothenburg at the University of Gothenburg, which proves the alliance of scientists for an effective plastic treaty, said that science explains what it takes to end pollution and protect human health. She added that science supports the treatment of the full life cycle of plastic, from extraction and production, and restricting some chemicals to ensure that the plastic materials are safer and more sustainable.

“The science has not changed,” she said. “It cannot be negotiated.”

Environmental protection advocates, waste forums, indigenous leaders and many business executives from business managers have traveled to make their voices heard. Use some creative tactics, but they are disappointed.

The indigenous leaders sought a treaty that recognizes their rights and knowledge. Frankie Orona, Executive Director of the Texas -based Nations Association, said the best option is to move forward with more negotiations “to fight for a treaty that really protects people and the planet.”