Stephen King is right to the violence of superheroes

by Dru diet
| Published 23 seconds ago

Stephen King Do you make the press tours again thanks to a version? Long walkAdapt to his brutal story about the endurance competition that claims the life of its competitors. The original story is dark and abstract. Stephen King knew that any adaptation in a movie could not be ashamed of the violence and deterioration that causes young children. He said at the same amount in recent interviews, but he made a specific comparison that got a lot of cortical obsessive.

When talking about violence in Long walkStephen King brought a super hero’s films as an example as it mitigates the effects of violence. Specifically, he was talking about huge pieces that include a lot of property destroying and how many of these films did not show any kind of human elements in these serials.

We will get into the reason why this is an unfortunate dilemma, but Stephen King is right when he talks about superhero films that do not expose the true effects of similar violence.

PG-13 problem

The main trend of Stephen King’s argument for superheroes is driven by these films that need to stay within the expected PG-13 classification. However, this is what always bothered me about this entire mentality. If you offer a lot of violence, but you do not show realistic consequences of this violence, this is a pure imagination that the adults (or mature minds) cannot completely address. However, this is the type of material we see more suitable for younger minds.

Therefore, this leaves us in the place criticized by Stephen King: The films designated for the younger fans are full of violence, but they do not actually imagine them in a way that reflects reality. Therefore, the imagination of violence becomes very refused to deal with its subject. Grant, all this depends on trying to dismantle the head of censorship, so who knows what these monsters really think? But the King’s point rings properly when it comes to telling violent stories of any superhero or heroes.

Violence is vital

Look, I do not say that Superman A bloodbath or anything like that. What matters is that the violence of the story is in harmony with any novel that tells. The all that this created by Stephen King was about Long walk It is honestly adapted. It is not in a targeted way “just like the events of the book”, but that the film cannot betray the dark heart of the original King’s story. Violence was not part of the story, it is an essential issue of the king’s political comment.

I love violence in art. To be able to portray violence in art is a necessary venting for us as human creatures. We are violent beings, regardless of how much an attempt to fight our primitive nature. Sometimes, the only way to prevent those feelings from becoming really is to imagine them. This is what Stephen King really feels in his comments. We need to influence violence in our popular art, especially if this is part of the stories that try to say something crucial. For some people, imagination is much more effective than reality. They may respond more to the person who is shot in the head more than a real child who dies on social media fodder.