Stephen King has a big problem with super films (which is not wrong)

James Bond kills more people for every movie From Jason Furis. In his 24 films until now, James Bond was directly responsible for the death of about 597 people, as it reached 24,875 dead per movie. Meanwhile, Jason only killed about 195 people through his 12 films, with an average of 16.25 murders for each film. However, James Bond is seen as a good hero, while Jason is depicted as a thirsty monster. Do not care that the possibilities are greater that you are firing a British spy more than a British spy than it was penetrated in the neck with a super -masked zombie.

In action movies, violence is often seen as a fair and correct thing. The “hero” personality usually has the moral license to kill and break up those who wish, provided that their chosen victims are from the bad guys or bad guys. Superman may not want to kill the dictators in his last movie – even It comes out of the way to save the squirrel – But Hawkgirl does not have such tools, killing a dictator with eagerness. Killing can be heroic.

Meanwhile, in horror movies, killing is always seen as terrifying. Watch death closely will include viscera, cracking bones, and blood. Horror movies know that death is frightening, and it is an idea that is weak on this entire type. Certainly, the audience may laugh when the head of adolescents who head bubbles is beheaded, but both filmmakers and fans know that actual killing is bad. We must be afraid of death. And if we enjoy the weapon in terror, Gorehounds know that it is sabotage and/or naughty. Strangely, horror movies are more morally amazing than the action films.

Stephen King agrees to this view. in A recent interview with time in the United KingdomThe famous horror author indicated that the superhero films regularly aim to large cities in fiery rings, yet no one bleeds or suffers from ever. Super heroes want to portray all violence, but they are taking all suffering to make violence more acceptable.

And the king has a point. Super heroes transform into destruction, killing and violence into something that the entire family can enjoy. The masses accept the murders committed by the superheroes because they are, heroes. We have obtained a fictional parallel world of moral divorced women, where the good people are good, and they are ethically allowed to kill the bad guys. King objects to this, on the pretext that if you want violence in your movie, you must show it with all its horrific glory. Showing mass destruction without blood for pop entertainment, as it feels, is a type of total:

“If you look at the films of superheroes, you will see … some destroy the entire city blocks, but you never see any blood. (…), this is a mistake. It is almost, like, porn … I said, if it will not appear, do not care. And so (The Long Walk” makes a great movie. “

“The Long Walk”, based on the story of Stephen King Short, revolves around a competition that the contestants should walk to fall. If they slow down a lot, they kill. If they break the ankle, they must continue. Only another man stands and gets a giant cash prize. Neither the original novel nor the movie is ashamed of the horror of the hypothesis.

Of course, the motion films accumulate on the deck, right? They are allowed to show the heroes who are committing a murder because their victims are roasted to be evil that cannot be repaired. There is nothing wrong with killing Thanos Because Thanos – and he did – kills half of the universe when he had the opportunity. It is okay to celebrate the destruction of cities because it is at the service of killing a bad man who is destroying, if you give the opportunity.

But the king prefers that violence takes place on a more intimate face to face. He would like to see blood. Otherwise, the film is not responsible.