Starmer hopes to remove “past battles” with the European Union reset deal

Sir Kerr Starmer claimed on Monday that he moved from “ancient discussions and political battles” to the era of Britain’s exit from the European Union. It is about to know if this is true.

The reaction to the “re -relations” of the European Union or Potok’s relations was Britain’s exit from the European UnionThe sulfur discussion by talking about the “summit of surrender” and “betrayal” of the United Kingdom and the British fishermen.

The Prime Minister’s challenge is to persuade voters that his deal is already addressing the challenges facing Britain in mid -2010, and that the old discussions about Britain’s exit from the European Union are the remains of the past decade.

Some of the Labor Party deputies preferred Starmer than to start making the case for his deal – which was months of making – a long time before the agreement was signed with European Union leaders at Lancaster House on Monday.

Instead of engaging with the European discussion, Starmer has instead spent the past few months in denial that he had any intention to agree to some of the things he put on the train on Monday – including the youth transport scheme.

In the event that there is no “player on the field” by the Prime Minister, opponents, including Nigel Farraj, of the United Kingdom and conservative leader Kimin Badnouch, have accumulated, as the Conservative Party leader suggested that Starmer entered these talks as a “invitation.”

The summit series contained abundant materials for Bixiests-and their supporters in the media-to work with it, including the extension of 12 years of the rights of European Union fishermen to work in UK waters.

The plans associated with lowering barriers that prevent food trade with an agreement that Britain is “dynamically compatible” with the future Brussels bases in the region, with no right to vote on it. Badenoch has pledged to the opposite of this measure, which you see is an insult to national sovereignty.

Located in the small publication, there is also a pledge by Britain to pay money to Brussels to develop work in the field of food and animal standards. The European Court of Justice will remain the ruling on European Union law points.

Starmer’s press conference at Lancaster House is the beginning of a marketing campaign. He presented the deal as a victory for British consumers, business and security for the ideological stabilizers of Bixiests.

The deal called 9 billion pounds annually of economic benefits by 2040 through the easiest trade, as he claimed, reflecting some of the failures of the Boris Johnson Brexit deal. Food prices for consumers will decrease.

British travelers will find that it is easier to use electronic gates and take their pets to Europe on vacation, while fishermen-although they will have to share their fish with their European Union counterparts-will benefit from the easiest trade in their products with Europe.

“It is time to look forward,” Starmer said. “To move from the old, meaningless discussions and political battles to find practical and practical solutions that get the best for the British people.

“We are ready to work with partners if that means that we can improve people’s lives here at home. This is what this deal revolves around – facing the world again, in the great traditions of this nation.”

The Starmer’s argument is that Britain was exercising its right to apply the European Union regulations in the main areas for business and shoppers – rather than taking a technical view of sovereignty.

He said, “Building the relationships that we choose, with the partners we choose, and closing deals in the national interest,” he said. “Because this is what independent sovereign nations do.”

The security and defense partnership in Lancaster House – which opens the way to closer relations with the European Union in terms of armaments and military training – has been clarified as a major example.

With the UK reform breathing work in the fields of the working class – as confirmed in the English local elections for this month – the reopening of the British exit arguments from the European Union is a risky strategy for Starmer.

But he seeks to say that ordinary voters want the work government to have a trade deals agreement with the European Union – as with India and the United States earlier this month – and that they will benefit financially from them.

Although the media environment that makes such an argument still is toxic, opinion polls indicate that the public has moved from Britain’s exit from the European Union and that many people who voted to leave the European Union are now disappointed that “the promise of Britain’s exit from the European Union” was not fulfilled.

Ugov poll I found that only 13 percent of the voters include “Britain leaves the European Union” as one of the three main areas that concern them today, compared to more than 70 percent in 2020 at the height of Britain’s exit negotiations from the European Union.

A survey in Yougov in January 2025 to celebrate the fifth anniversary of the British Union’s exit from the European Union I found it 55 percent of the British now says it is wrong for the United Kingdom to leave the United Kingdom, as he only saw 11 percent that Britain from the European Union was more success than failure.

On this background, there are also risks on Farage and Badenoch to participate in arguments about the Brexit project that many voters now see failure. In particular, Farage focused on issues such as climate change, “waking” issues, and the economy.

On Monday, Starmer submitted a “good job, good and good to our borders”: The post -Britain’s exit agreement from the European Union presented as a retail policy. You will see the coming days whether Britain has already put what it calls “past battles.”