Starmer apologizes for noting “the island of strangers”

Photo of author

By [email protected]


Digest opened free editor

Sir Kerr Starmer apologized for commenting that Britain had come to become a “island of strangers” due to excessive migration, saying that he “deeper” regretted the use of the language that the controversial conservative minister, Enok Powell, repeated.

The Prime Minister said that he was “not true” in using the phrase in the speech last month, where he promised it exhaustion The government was abandoning immigration figures.

He said that he or his book was aware that the phrase endured a similarity from a line of Powell in the famous “Day of Blood” speech in 1968, when the Conservative Party said that the British are risking to become “strangers in their country.”

In the speech received on May 12, the Prime Minister said that the countries depend on fair rules, values, rights, responsibilities and mutual obligations: “In a diverse country like us … we risk to become an island of strangers, not the nation that walks together.”

Enoch Powell provides his controversial speech
Enoch Powell provides his controversial speech “Day of Blood” against Immigration in 1968 © Center Press/Hulton/Getty Images

The use of this phrase in particular has attracted anger from left -wing critics, who believe that Starmer turns away to the right in order to neutralize the threat of reform in the United Kingdom, the popular Nigel Farraj Party, which is currently leading opinion polls and taking the council seats from the Labor Party in North Hartlands in the local elections for this year.

He told the Powell newspaper observer newspaper.

“But this particular phrase – no, was not correct. I will give you the sincere truth – I am very regretted using it.”

Changing the position-after the ministers have spent days in defending the language-is the newest turn by Starmer in recent weeks.

The Prime Minister cleared plans to decipher winter fuel payments for most retirees, and bent over to launch a national investigation into the gangs of gangs after the resistance for several months, and this week took over the luxury bill to avoid the huge rebellion.

Earlier this month, the New State Statsman magazine told him that he would wish to be more clear in his immigration letter and that in the past he did not seem “progressive” enough.

In the observer’s interview on Friday with Tom Baldwin-the former journalist and head of journalism for one time in the Labor Party, who wrote a biography of Starmer’s biography-the Prime Minister also that there were “problems with language” at the forefront of the government’s policy document in June.

And that paper said that the record number of large numbers of immigrants entering the United Kingdom under the recent government had caused “countless damage” to the country.

Starmer told the observer that the case needs to be addressed because the party “has become very far from people working on things like immigration.” But he admitted that “this was not the way to do this in this current environment.”

In the same interview, the Prime Minister also revealed that his sister was living in his old home in London when he was subjected to his mutation last month.

The prime minister said that his wife and partner were in the bedroom at his former home in Tofnil Park when the attack occurred at 1.30 o’clock.

“I came across you are still awake,” said Starmer. “So I heard the noise and got the fire brigade. But it could have been a different story.”

Three men have been charged with intentional burning attacks on the real estate associated with Starmer: The Kentish Town Property, the Illengeton building connected to the PM and a car he had previously owned.

Elsewhere in the piece, Starmer revealed that he achieved a deliberate point in embracing President Voludimir Zelinski from Ukraine when he arrived in Downing Street shortly after his general row with Donald Trump at the White House.

He said, “Usually, I was waiting for the step to greet him.” “But I was really aware that he left the White House alone. That is why I walked towards him and gave him a kind of hug.

“This is why I got out of the car in the end; I wanted him to know that you are not leaving my house alone.”



https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/https%3A%2F%2Fd1e00ek4ebabms.cloudfront.net%2Fproduction%2Fe02db422-d31a-404d-a5ed-c6989438361e.jpg?source=next-article&fit=scale-down&quality=highest&width=700&dpr=1

Source link

Leave a Comment