They were cautious with explicit pictures – as usual. But did you make any teams?
Traditional news organizations were careful in their middle coverage The assassination of Charlie Kirk On Wednesday, he does not depict the moment when he was shot, instead, a video of him was shown throwing a hat for his fans before, and spectators spread in the following moments.
Practically, although it does not matter. The Gory of the showning was almost immediately available on the Internet, from several angles, in slow and actual time. Watch millions of people.
It was easy to find the video xOn Facebook, on Tiktok, on Instagramon YouTube Even in the social fact, President Donald Trump published an official speech on the death of the conservative activist. He explained how the role of “preserving the gate” of news organizations in the social media age changed.
Kirk was shot at a general event in front of hundreds of people on the campus of Utah College, where many of them carry phones to record a celebrity in their midst and intelligence on how to publish video evidence on a news event.
On X, there was a video clip showing a direct display of Kirk being photographed, his body retreated and the blood flows from a wound. One video clip was an episode showing the moment of influencing the slow movement, and stopping before seeing the blood. Another included, taken from the left of Kirk, the sound that Kirk suggested that Kirk talk about armed violence at the moment he was shot.
More than 150 years ago, news institutions such as newspapers and television networks have long been accustomed to “preserving the gate” when it comes to explicit content – making liberation decisions on violent events to determine the images and words that appear on their platforms for their readers or viewers. But in the era of social media, smartphones and instant video downloads, the editorial decisions by the old media are less influential than ever.
Pictures are spread throughout the country
Throughout the country in Ethaka, New York, the children of the college professor Sarah Krebis in teenagers made text messages about Kirk’s assassination shortly after the school refusal and can reach their phones.
No, I told them. He was shot, but there were no reports that he died. Her son answered: Did you watch the video? He could not have survived.
Videos were published and re -postponed at lightning speed. One person urged X to “stop violence”, but then included the shooting clip. Many people moved to social media to plead for people for not publishing the pictures. “For the love of God and the Charlie family, read one message,” only stop. “
YouTube said it removes “some graphic content” related to the event if it does not provide sufficient context, and to restrict videos so that it cannot be seen by users under the age of 18 or those who have not been recorded.
YouTube said: “Our hearts with the Charlie Kerk family after his tragic death.” “We closely watch our platform and raise the content of the news prominently on the home page, in searching and in recommendations to help people know.”
Do not prohibit the bases of Meta videos like Kirk’s Shooting, but warning stickers are applied and not displayed to users who say they are less than 18 years old. The parent company of Instagram, Facebook and Threads referred a correspondent to the company’s policies on violent and graphic content, which they indicated will be applied in this case, but had no additional comment. X -representative did not immediately return a request for comment.
It is an issue with which social media companies have previously dealt with, in heinous circumstances. Facebook was forced to confront people who want standard violence with a Group fire in New Zealand In 2019, Kreps of the University of Cornell, the next book, said, “Hosage of turmoil: building the future of technology without breaking society.”
Access to the other side
Some pictures leaked into more traditional media. TMZ posted a video of Kirk where a snapshot and sound can be heard, “Oh, my God,” but the upper part of Kirk’s body was unclear. A similar video was posted with an unclear image of Kirk on New York Post.
In such an atmosphere, the care that most traditional news means may appear strange or old. But news industry leaders are fully aware of the protection of people from graphic images when they do not expect it; It is more difficult to happen on the Internet, as many people have to find a picture and click on whether they want to see it – if it is not already sent to you or your collective chat.
Krebis said that there could be an important message sent by news that is cautious about what they show. “The traditional media can inflate behavior and verify health,” she said. “It can be a reference to how to stigmatize things, instead of verifying or normalizing them.”
But on the day of shooting in a political, political, ease of availability of horrific images exposes the risk of making a society wound more painful.
“I do not see how many signs of how we get – as a people, as a nation – to the other side of this,” said David Chalian from CNN. “I think we are broken, and it may not be fixed.”
___
AP correspondent Barbara Ortotai in San Francisco contributed to this report.
https://fortune.com/img-assets/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/AP25253691178788-e1757601597404.jpg?resize=1200,600
Source link