- The Silicon Valley and Washington also builds closer relationshipsTechnology leaders have provided advice on how the government can better and faster innovation. Founders and investors from startups in the field of defense technology said that the Pentagon should reduce bullets and raise levels of tolerance with risks to develop new weapons.
Years after trying to achieve steps in the famous Byzantine defense sector in the US government, the Silicon Valley finally gets its chance.
crop Defense new startups From the valley, they make their way to Washington at a time when the Pentagon is keen on new technology. Many of the leading numbers of technology Backed President Donald Trump, reinforced a New bond Between an industry that was previously known for the support of Democrats.
The most prominent modern conference in the new capital of the country Ties Between technology and government. On Wednesday, the Hill and Valley Forum was distinguished by an executive director of the highest defense technology companies such as Palantir’s Alex Carb and SensorBrian Shambab, rubbing the shoulders with government officials such as then national security adviser Mike Waltz as well as members of the Senate Armed Services Committee such as Johnny Ernst (R-IOWA), Mike tours (RS.D.), and Jack Reed (Dr.i).
Against the background of the deliberate geopolitical competition for the United States with China, government technology leaders expanded to take the government A page from Playbook found a welcome audience.
Valz said that the White House “is completely devoted to fixing the way we gain technology” in order to modernize the US military, a day before leaving its role as a national security adviser.
Trump has signed several Executive orders This would slow down how the Ministry of Defense acquires new defense systems. The startups in the field of defense technology have always maintained that the current methods have left them unable to compete with the current military contractors who considered them lower products but deeper relationships in the Pentagon.
Falaz told the public during a committee entitled a committee entitled a committee entitled a committee entitled a committee entitled. Arsenal was re -visualized: The Ministry of Defense was designed in the twenty -first of the battlefield. “We can fill this hall by cutting off the defense of repair and acquisition, but you have a president and you have a leading team of all gas, not brakes, and sometimes we learn about the guidance.”
At the conversation center, the Pentagon’s tendency to bids and long and extended research projects, and a risk culture that made it difficult for the Ministry of Defense to take opportunities in experimental technology.
“There is an essential fact that innovation is chaotic and chaotic,” said Shiam Sancar, the chief technology official in Balddir.
On Friday, the White House presented a 2026 Federal Budget That included 1.01 trillion dollars In dod financing. Defense startups Search for themselves in a strange situation of frustration with the operations of the Ministry of Defense, which they consider amazing and hostile to the marathmia, and at the same time flirting with its work. Now, due to the close relationship of Silicon Valley with the Trump administration, the political allies of the reforms are looking for.
“You are still shooting on hardship.”
But even with the opening of DOD, the purchases of technology and startup companies, they will still face a difficult market, according to Palantir’s Karp.
“I am still shooting on arduous, but shooting on arduous and shooting like installation while dropping the grenades.” Flight a lawsuit against the US military In 2016, he was banned from bids for a government contract. This step is widely considered to have it to open Pentagon doors to the silicon valley.
Schimpf Anduril suggested that the Pentagon should put large orders with defensive startups. “If you bought things, the capital will flow to the defense,” he said. “Buying things widely, which moves the needle and creates opportunities on board.”
SchimPf added that large contract guarantees, Anduril “has just stipulated” the development of new versions of products such as air missiles that you do not think will find a buyer. He said: “I have not believed for 20 years anyone who will buy any air missile to the air, because they have already committed” to buy from another person.
Emile Michael, Trump’s defense candidate under research and engineering, believes that Pentagon may be less dependent on specially designed and more open defense systems to current commercial products when searching for a new technology for purchase. “We don’t always need allocated things,” he said.
Michael, who has not yet confirmed his role in the Pentagon, said that the Ministry of Defense could also benefit from looking at opportunities to save time, not just money. “Save time is not something inherent in the DOD business model, (which) about reducing risks to the smallest possible component at the expense of moving as quickly as possible.”
Quickly failed, often failed
In discussions on developing new technologies, the conversation often turned into one of the Silicon Valley talisman: failed quickly, often fails. The idea, which is an essential element in technology culture, is that the many failed repetitions of the product does not matter as long as the final version works.
“Failure does not matter. It is the scale of the success that matters,” said Vinod Khosla, an investment capitalist when asked about how to make the government more comfortable with risk.
Sankar suggested from Palantir to increase competition between the Ministry of Defense employees, so they will have “an incentive to overcome two doors below the bureaucrats below the corridor.” He considers that DOD as betting of creating innovation by being the only buyer of the market defense systems.
Instead, Sankar suggested that there are multiple program managers assigned to oversee the same project, with the contract at the end of the person who achieved a better result. “They will wake up every day, like the excessive Americans in the competition who are trying to kill each other,” he said. “There will be an incentive like” Yes, let’s go faster. Let’s do this better. “
Speakers at the conference said that continuous geopolitical tensions and the AI Arm race with China have added more urgency to this issue.
Michael said: “And when you are in the race of artificial intelligence when every innovation leads to dozens of billions, if not hundreds of billions, and the value of creation – you think about creating value as a better defense, and a shield, more deterrence – every minute you lose is expensive.”
This story was originally shown on Fortune.com
https://fortune.com/img-assets/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/GettyImages-451021677-e1746233540331.jpg?resize=1200,600
Source link