Shooting reactions to Kirk Kirk killed the freedom of expression in the United States Politics News

Washington, DC, Journalists, academics, airlines, doctors and restaurant workers have been investigated or investigated throughout the United States. Charlie Kerk.

In a moment of increasing political tensions in the United States, the fires in the United States ignited discussions on the limits of freedom of expression, the abolition of culture, dexen and work protection, as well as the Kirk heritage.

Recommended stories

List of 3 elementsThe end of the list

The 31 -year -old right commentator was shot in Utah last week.

While parts of the country Haddad on Kirk As a martyr defending patriotism and open debate, others recalled his division views, including his anti -immigrant speech and Islamic fear. Some even celebrated his death.

Many Republicans responded to a campaign of naming and ashamed to reject, who responded to the assassination in ways they consider it rejected.

Former MSNBC analyst Matthew Dod was one of the first goals of this effort.

Shortly after Kirk’s shooting, Dod said that the conservative commentator pushed a “hate speech” against some groups. The analyst in the air said: “White ideas lead to hateful words, which then lead to hateful actions.”

The comment raised anger from Supporters of KirkThe leadership of the MSNBC President Rebecca Kotler to apologize for what she described as “inappropriate, unacceptable and unacceptable notes.”

Dowd was later launched-a step to reject it and blame it on the right “Media Mob” “of his words”.

This week, column writer Karen Atta was dismissed from her website in the Washington Post because of her response to Kirk’s killing.

Atta launched a series of social media publications on race and armed violence after the assassination.

A termination letter participated on the Internet was martyred on Tuesday in a publication that defended the refusal to engage in “mourning performance of a white man who adopts violence” without Kerk clearly as one of the reasons for her dismissal.

A statement after the union’s leadership:

The Washington Post condemns the non -fair shooting of column writer Karen Ata

The Washington Post, the Washington Bost Caren Ata, launched its social media.

– The Washington Post (Postguild) Syndicate September 15, 2025

Campaign to dismiss officials

The ordinary citizens from all aspects of life also faced calls to abandon them from their jobs to take them on Kirk killed – Publications of social media that ranged from death in his death, linking the assassination to the views of the commentator and supporting weapons rights.

For example, the influential right -wing social media accounts were calling for fire on Pennsylvania teacher for his call as “racist”, although she also said that he “does not deserve death.”

Kerk himself was not strange to controversial opinions. He repeatedly attacked Islam and Muslims.

“Islam is the sword that the left uses to save America’s throat,” he wrote in a post of recent social media.

He was also promoting a “big alternative” Conspiracy – The idea that there is a plan (usually implemented by the Jewish elites) to replace the white population with immigrants, which inspired the white collectors around the world.

But on the right, the Kirk situation rose only after his death. With this apparent sanctification, the batch came to protect his legacy from critics and those who find humor, joy or paradox in his death.

Immediately after the shooting, Right groups I began to publish personal names and information – including the place of employment – for social media users who are claiming to celebrate the assassination.

Republican politicians, including LegislatorsJoin calls to release individuals on social media jobs related to Kirk that you consider offensive.

In Indiana, the state prosecutor Todd Rockita encouraged the presentations to a database about school staff who made “comments celebrating or rationalizing” the shooting of Kirk.

🚨hoosiers: If you have evidence of Indiana teachers or school principals who have comments celebrating or spraying the assassination of Charlie Kerk, we need to hear from you.

These individuals should be responsible – they have no place to teach our students.

➡ … pic.twitter.com/w6ohkuylqp

– Ag Toodd Rokita (@agdoddrokita) September 12, 2025

US Vice President JD Vance also supported this effort, saying that the people who celebrated the assassination should consider their account. He said on Monday: “Call them, and Al -Hilim, call their employer.”

American Congress member Randy Fine, from Florida, threatened to cancel the licenses of the professional state of the perpetrators, including lawyers, teachers and doctors.

He chanted himself to kill the American citizen AYSENUR EZGI EYGI By Israeli forces last year. He wrote on social media after Eygi was shot in the occupied West Bank: “One is less than #MUUSLIMERRORRORRORRORRORRORRORRORRORRORRORRRORR

Is it legal?

While the first amendment to the United States constitution guarantees freedom of expression, it does not apply to private employers.

But some states have laws to protect speech and political activities for employees when they are not at work.

Jenin Younis, a prominent lawyer for freedom of freedom, who has recently become the Legal Director of the American-Arabic Control Committee (ADC), said that private companies have “many length lines” to reprimand workers for their speech.

However, when it comes to public schools and universities, it is more complicated.

Public employers, on a large scale, are obligated to First amendment“But there are circumstances that they can think about a person’s speech to launch it,” Yunus said.

These “exceptions and qualifications” are on the basis of each case separately.

For example, Yunus said that a public school teacher could say that Kirk’s ideas were “hateful”, but he says he deserves to die, which is likely to cross the line.

Regardless of the law, Yunus said that the shooting madness is “a philosophical problem”, especially given that some people have been simply dismissed to criticize Kirk, not glorifying violence.

“It is very bad for a free society,” she said to spend the island. “People depend on their jobs. They need their jobs to live and support their families. Therefore, if we want to live in a society where we have strong dialogue and discussions, which is the purpose of the first amendment, it is bad from a practical point of view.”

Younis said that she understands why private employers may want to curb social media publications by employees who collide with the company’s brand and its mission.

She added that a better approach than abandoning workers is to discuss the matter with them and warn them against refraining from publishing similar messages in the future.

“We must always make mistakes towards more discussion, discussion and not to silence people,” Yunus said. “We have to remember that people have moments when they become emotional and say things they do not mean.”

In addition to the shooting campaign, many Republican politicians prompted political ideas to regulate speech, especially on social media, after that Kirk killed.

The US Republican Republican Congress member, Clay Higgins, pledged to “use Congress authority and every effect with large technology platforms to delegate the immediate ban (AN) of the life of each publication or commentator that led to the mixing of the assassination of” Kirk.

The US Congress member Cheeb Roy led a letter in Congress asking to form a committee to investigate the “radical left”.

For its part, Public Prosecutor Bam Bondi suggested that the federal authorities would press to punish the words they consider hateful.

She said on Monday: “There is freedom of expression and then there is a hate speech.” “We will target you completely, and take you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech.”

The reflection of the role

For some observers, this right -wing batch is increasingly appears like the reflection of the role of ideological mass in the United States.

For years, the oath against the idea of ​​”hate speech” and some left-wing fire activists intensified and “canceling” those who have opinions they find abusive-especially in ethnic and sexual identity issues.

The right -wing politicians were also vocal opponents of any government efforts to organize social media content.

Kirk himself refused to punish the “hate speech”, although he supported the American president Donald Trump Activists must support Palestine.

“The hate speech does not exist legally in America,” Kirk wrote in a post on social media last year. “There is an ugly speech. There is a grave speech. There is a evil speech. All this is protected by the first amendment. Keep America.”

Younis, who led a lawsuit against the democratic administration of former US President Joe Biden for the alleged social media control efforts During the Covid-19 pandemicI noticed what he called “hypocrisy”.

She said: “Many people who were against the” cancellation of culture “, when the left was doing it, are now very eager to adopt the culture of cancellation when they do not like the relevant speech, which I think shows the heart of the conflict on this issue.”

“Everyone claims that it is against censorship when the ideas they love are subject to censorship, but when their opponents are ideological, they are very happy to do control.”

She warned that the batch to reduce freedom of expression about Kirk’s killing could extend to other issues, including intensifying the campaign to call for Palestinian rights.

She said, “It can always be modified by any type of control used for one type of speech to apply it to another type of speech.”