Shikhar Dhawan reveals the reason for choosing to boycott India for Pakistan’s matches in WCL 2025

Sheikhmar Dawn’s decision to boycott India matches against Pakistan in World Legends Championship (WCL) 2025 He was rooted in a personal conviction and a sense of national solidarity, rather than any coercion or external guidance.

Shekhar Duwan explains his decision to boycott matches against Pakistan

After the tragic terrorist attack in Bahama in April, the emotions were high throughout India, with widespread public anger at the idea of engaging in the Cricket match – albeit between retired players – Pakistan. Online violent reaction was immediate and intense when the group stage India against Pakistan match It was scheduled to be held on June 20. In the face of these feelings, Duan, along with many Indian colleagues such as Harbhajan Singh and Suresh Raina, announced their withdrawal from the match. The game was later canceled by WCL organizers, who apologized to Indian players “Unintentionally caused discomfort.”

The controversy did not end there. The fate again incited India against Pakistan in the semi -finals, but the Indian team, which partially led him by the position of Dahwan Al -Muttami, again refused to play. As before, the match was canceled, and Pakistan advanced to the final. The events raised questions in the media and the fans: Was boycotting the directives of the Cricket Control Council in India (BCCI) or government authorities? Also rumors about pressure from shepherds and cricket officials.

Also read: “We also crushed them”: The position of bold Sorech after the Pakistan champions received the adherence to South Africa in the WCL 2025 final

“My country means everything for me, and nothing above the nation.”

In a recent interview, Dhawan recorded the record. Emphasized, “I was personally against playing the match against Pakistan, and it was a conscious decision I made. He chose some others, including Bhajji Paa (Harbhajan Singh), not to participate in that particular game.” Dahwan, “There was no pressure from anyone. Some of us were not simply comfortable playing against Pakistan, and we haven’t seen any convincing reason to move forward and participate in the game.” He emphasized that for him, the nation comes first: “My country means everything for me, and nothing above the nation.” These notes show that the boycott stems from the collective conscience of the players, many of whom were emotionally influenced by the PAALGAM attack and felt that the play could send a wrong message.

Dhawan’s position was echoed by the other senior Indian players who decided combined, in light of the current circumstances, to participate in a match against Pakistan that were not in line with their values or general feelings. This unified front prompted the Indian myths of organizers to respect their decision, despite the disappointment of fans and the reaction of the reverse reaction from some quarters of the cricket society.

The clear and direct interpretation of Dhawan was widely supported by the Indian public, which enhances the idea that some national gestures – such as boycotting the cricket match against a competitive nation – transmit the boundaries of sport itself.

Also read: “I will suggest to you …”: WCL owner amazes the announcer Karishma Kotak during the live broadcast