Section broke 31

“Star Trek” was not always on his depletion on trips. “The original series,” The best in “Journey”, Only three seasons lasted on NBC before the network spoiled due to low classifications. The fans were abstract, but they kept the burning flame for a decade (and they did two seasons of “The Animated Series”), and they celebrated when the director Robert Wise brought the StarsHip Enverrise project for “Star Trek: The Motion Pictore”, but when the film failed to perform the box office expectations For Paramount Pictures (with a total of $ 83 million in the United States with a budget of $ 44 million), the privilege of ropes seemed again.

Fortunately, director Nicholas Mayer came to his length and correct the championship with “Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan”, which achieved $ 79 million in the United States and put the privilege in a profitable course This made the “next generation” applicable; From there, the privilege expanded in wonderful, thinking and entertaining ways. It can be said, that “Star Trek” was not in a better condition.

This is a good thing because, last week, Olatunde Osunsansanmi is shown, a feature film written by Craig Sweeeny “Star Trek: Security 31” on Paramount+, and according to the vast majority of critics and journey fans, the concession has performed serious damage. How bad is? According to the review, the spoiled tomatoes for the review, as they stand alone on everything that comes boldly before it.

Several years ago, Alex Kurstmann “Star Trek” looked at the current way to build the famous “Star Trek: Discovery”, which looked at building a series about Michelle Joho Philippe Georgio. “Star Trek: Strange New Worlds”, ending with the “Discovery” series, but there was a feeling that fans wanted more Georgio. So Kurstmann pushed forward in Spinoff (a pre -derived series derived), and so “Star Trek: Security 31” went before the cameras.

/Description of Jacob Hall “Star Trek: Section 31” As “den from thieves” is acceptable of its kind with a aesthetic aesthetic designed to bring in unusual and less intelligent science fans-if possible. However, critics have mostly found that the film is unacceptable outside the limits of what “Star Trek” should be. It is not a matter of exploring high space, but, instead, the fun that serves the self. According to spoiled tomatoes, this was not a profitable formula.

Since it exploded in theaters during the summer of 1989, “Star Trek V: The Final Frontier” was considered to William Shaatner on a large scale low water sign of concession. I think the movie has a transient magic (Kirk, Spock and Bones Go Camping), but every plot to bring the stars to God is HoEy. It is bad. Given that it currently measures 23 % fresh in spoiled tomatoes, most of my colleagues appear to agree.

But it is no longer the worst “Star Trek” anything According to spoiled tomatoes. As of this post, “Star Trek: Section 31″ below Star Trek V: The Final Frontier ” In 20 % fresh. Through this scale, Nader Al -Mutlaq represents the “Star Trek”. With a new season of “Star Trek: Strange New Worlds” on the way, I doubt that anyone will give this movie another idea, while we will always remember warmly “Grade, class, boat row” From “The Final Borders”. This is more than I can say about “Star Trek: rebellion”.