SEC calmly surrendered to the largest battle of its encryption

Photo of author

By [email protected]


The largest and most dependent legal war ended in the world. Ripple Labs, the Fintech giant, has just closed the book in its five -year battle with the US Securities and Stock Exchange Committee, which ended a battle that has become an agent for the future of the courdece of cryptocurrency in America.

The sudden settlement is welcomed as a historical victory for the encryption industry and a major blow to the “SEC” controversial “implementation” strategy.

The organizer said in a statement On July 7.

What was the battle?

Ripple is a company that uses cryptocurrency, XRP, to make international funds transplants faster and cheaper than traditional banking systems. In 2020, SEC filed a lawsuit against Ripple, claiming that XRP was unregistered safety. In simple terms, security is an investment contract, such as stock share. If the distinctive code code is considered safe, then it must follow the same strict registration and disclosure rules, most encryption projects have not been fulfilled. The SEC victory can have an effective XRP in the United States and a precedent to charge hundreds of other symbols.

On August 7, the battle ended officially. The Supreme Education Council has announced “a joint text to reject the appeal and resolve civil enforcement procedures against Ripple”, while Ripple agreed to drop it. The final ruling of the lower court – including a 125 million dollar penalty – will remain in effect, but the war has ended.

While Ripple pays a penalty –50 million dollars-The company is running a much more valuable prize: a legal precedent for changing the game. Judge Angisa Torres Judge SEC handled a big blow by finding XRP sales on public exchanges – where buyers are unknown and do not deal directly with the company – it was not qualified as securities transactions. This part of the decision is still intact.

This is a huge deal. It creates a decisive discrimination that other encryption projects can now use them in their legal battles, which protects them from SEC demanding comprehensive power on the market. By choosing stability instead of risk to support this ruling by a higher court, the Securities and Stock Exchange Commission showed the boundaries of the book “Organizing it through implementation”: its strategy of establishing rules through individual claims instead of issuing clear guidelines for this industry.

The chief legal official of Ripple, Stuart Alderoty, wrote on X, “The end … and now returns to work.”

What does it mean on the main street

While both sides can demand partial victories, the biggest winner is the main street, or the ordinary investors and developers who have fallen into organizational chaos for years. The brutal legal battle forced the court to confirm that not all digital assets are securities automatically, especially when they are circulated by the public. This provides a clearer set, although it is still incomplete, than the rules. For investors, it reduces the risk of declaring their property overnight. For innovators, it provides a slightly clearer way to build compatible projects in the United States, making the industry closer to the prevailing legitimacy.

We took

SEC spent years in an attempt to determine the encryption industry through litigation. The state of ripple shows that the strategy loses steam. The agency’s decision to settle instead of risk can conclude the loss of the other courtroom, other encryption companies to respond instead of agreeing to fast deals. This represents the beginning of a new chapter in the face of Crypto-Rasington, as it may finally be forced to rethink how digital assets have long been organized.





https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2025/07/bitcoin-photo-1200×675.jpg

Source link

Leave a Comment