Though We live in the era of “Newstalgia”, “ Where old shows and movies are re -submitted to the younger fans as if they were new, and the fact is that Hollywood was in Newstalgia from its inception. Certainly, the direct broadcast has taken excessive dependence in the industry to take advantage of the current IP to the strategy heights, but studios have always turned into fixed privileges and strikes in order to move through the uninterrupted box office water.
“It was lost in space” a great example. What began as a TV series CBS 1965-1968 several times since it was first broadcast, with almost plans to reunite TV films. But it was not until the late 1990s that anyone actually produced a new “lost” content that made it to the masses. A player, this was not one of the most successful clarification in Hollywood.
Producer Erwin Allen and based on Johan David Wes in 1812, “The Swiss Family Robinson”, the “Lost In Space” series became a great success for CBS in the 1960s. Although it has never reached its contemporary heights, “Star Trek”, the width of the family and the robot that is strengthened in the distant space struck a tendon that many of this generation remember as an important part of the cultural fabric at that time. Participation deals included that the worship of the strike remained in public awareness in a form for decades, followed by this, though “Lost in Space”, which appeared at some time Court Russell, the young man, She never became the feeling of CBS, and there is no doubt that it was hoped when “Star Trek” passed in favor of Allen’s offer about the cosmic colonists who were forced to stay in the unknown space. Three seasons lasted before being canceled in 1968.
In the late 1990s, New Line decided that “Lost in Space” besides the attractiveness of this type of science fiction in general, presented a fertile ground to revive the series that was long canceled in the form of a wonderful movie starring Gary Oldman, William Hert, and the star of “Friends” at the height of his strength. It seems that everything is in place for “Lost In Space” to become the phenomenon that has always been able to exist. So what happened?
The new line was a bank on Lost in Space as a huge blow
When New Line decided to revive the “Lost In Space” in the late 1990s, the company was all in the idea. At that time, the original “Lost In Space” series was constantly working on the science fiction channel (now SYFY) since July 1993, where she held nine in the morning, and at the New Line show, ensuring that a new generation of viewers have learned about the show. But the older fans, who grew up with the Robinson family, was keen to engage. Before launching the film, the head of the Studio TV, Bob Friedman, explained the project behind the project diverseSaying: “There are 70 million baby births who remember the” missing space in space “because they combine family adventure with science fiction movement.”
In addition to the element of nostalgia for the past, it is clear that the new line depends on their hopes for the success of the film on the note that half the best 10 times in the box office in all ages were science fiction or neighboring science fiction: “Et The Out-The Out-RESTRIAL”, “Park Jurassic Park”, “Star Wars”, “Jedi Return”, and “Independence”. “Certainly,” Lost In Space “was directed to the success of the box office.
A new line is definitely believed. Even Friedman revealed the diversity that he was in negotiations with a network to produce two TV series from the back of the movie, one of the animation and one of the direct work, noting that both “mask” and “Dumb & Dumber” produced two of the new line lines at the time, half of the successful animation. Even the “main advertiser” was lined up to purchase the time to announce the offers. After that, there were goods deals, which the company will see responsible for producing “Independence Day” games that pump “missing characters in space”, while publishers participated to produce a series of books.
Meanwhile, the “Friends” star Matt Lieblank was appointed to enhance the attractiveness of the movie among young viewers. The actor has not yet come out in the role of Joy Tribian in the legendary scourge of NBC, which was at that time common as it was (this means, nothing less than a global feeling). Not only was “lost in space” to turn the IP itself into a full privilege, then, it was about to be the movie that turned into the Leblanc of a loved TV friend to Bonafide’s star. What can make a mistake?
It lost space failure at all
In order to ensure the success of “Lost in Space”, New Line was determined to update the CAMPY ‘series of the 60s series, which makes Industry Light & Magic at Campy Effects Company to create optical effects alongside Jim Henson creatures. With William Horte in the role of Professor John Robinson and Gary Oldman plays the role of Dr. Al -Sharbar Zakari Smith, as he has shown Matt Lieblank, and the fans also got some of the leading energy in the field of pioneering Pilots of Maverick Don West.
When the movie first appeared on April 3, 1998, things do not seem very bad. “Lost In Space” was the unlikely stirring that has already been able to get rid of “Titanic” At the box office, the matter ended 136 million dollars On a budget of $ 80 million. But flipping, was. Many engraving before Activists from the original “Lost In Space” series He could not save the movie from the critics, who criticized the New Line attempts to update the camp origin and take everything seriously. Stephen Hopkins also failed to persuade auditors, who gave a collective 27 % Spoiled tomatoes It is recorded in the movie. Needless to say, “Lost In Space” was the main revival of the new IP line that was hoping, and the first appearance of Liblik was not in the required moving image.
In recent years, Netflix managed to give “Lost In Space” a more merit of the three -season broadcasting series It was more received than the movie. Whether this proves that the story of the Robinson family is more convenient for the small screen, it is discussed, but it certainly looks in this way based on modern developments. Of course, just because something that did not succeed the first time does not mean that Hollywood will allow it to rest, so we may see another attempt on a large screen “lost in space” in the future. Perhaps everyone who produces this will actually wait for the numbers to come before the development begins in display operations.
Source link
https://www.slashfilm.com/img/gallery/a-matt-leblanc-sci-fi-flop-failed-to-revive-a-classic-television-series/l-intro-1748377888.jpg