“Rs 3.6 LPA isn’t bad if you’re from…”: Techie post on latest IT salaries sparks controversy

A technician’s post has sparked a heated debate over entry-level salaries in the IT sector in India.

Abhishek Nair supported the idea that Rs 3.6 lakh per annum is not a bad deal for freshers who do not have strong credentials or relevant skills.

“I may have a problem, but this has to be said: 3.6 LPA isn’t bad if you’re from a 500-level college and lack programming skills. Don’t expect a 1Cr package without a strong project portfolio. Don’t expect much if the highlight of your resume is Bachelor’s Degree,” sparking a storm of reactions.

Some users supported Nair’s argument, pointing out that a lack of practical skills often holds graduates back.

One user wrote: “I recently interviewed an Indian Institute of Technology graduate. While he knew advanced concepts like Fibonacci heap, he failed to apply them effectively. The real problem is that many students lack applied skills, regardless of their undergraduate level.”

Others rejected that, claiming that Nair’s position ignored broader systemic issues. “Inflation exists! A new entrant’s salary in 2004 can’t be the same as it will be in 2024. Offering £3.60 today is exploitation,” said one frustrated commenter.

Some commentators have rejected the assumption that graduates from higher institutions are inherently more deserving. “What I don’t agree with is the idea that an A-level college student deserves a Rs 1 crore package and is a natural genius. Success is based on skills, not rankings,” one of them pointed out.

In response to the criticism, Nair clarified his position. He stressed that his comments were directed at freshmen with minimal skills or outstanding achievements, not all graduates.

“I’m not asking anyone to settle for less. If you’re feeling underappreciated, it’s probably time to look for a better role or organization,” he explained.