Revenge against Seth is a masterpiece of the real stars war, George Lucas

Yes, I am that man – the elegant stands courageously in the Normuel Rokwell Mimi painting. I have a courage to say what we were all afraid of admitting it for 20 years: When George Lucas made his last movie “Star War”, “III” episode of 2005 – revenge on Seth “, Magnum Obus timed. The “Star War” Prequel He was similarly rejected by many filmmakers as being terrible, badly planned, and made strongly.

advertisement

But this is a mistake. Find your feelings, you know that it is correct.

Yes, I admit that I am a “prior child”-one of these millenniums who were born too late to see the original “Star Wars” trilogy in theaters, but only in time to believe that Podrace is really magic. Allow me that names with my older brother to the stage because this will be my last opportunity to watch the movie “Star Wars” on the big screen (funny, but it is true at the time. Episode.

advertisement

I was the perfect member of the audience to “take revenge on the sith”, although he was so enough that I closed my eyes when Anakin (Hayden Christine) turned into a burning end in Texas. “Lego Star Wars” and “Star Wars Battlefront II” played religiously on PlayStation 2 – two important matches for the “Star Wars” experience that appeared within six months of “revenge against the sith”. However, I quickly fell victim to popular feelings at that time, to a large extent thanks to the early YouTube that made spread on daily practice. I came to accept that “revenge against the seats” was a disaster. But I was wrong. And so I was.

To start, let’s deal with the huge and wonderful issue with “revenge on the seats” that no number of viewing can be: it’s the most sexual whose concession was “Star Wars” at all. Baraa Badmi (Natalie Portman) turns from the hero of the movement and an opposition political leader into “What will we do?” The woman who was defined by pregnancy and death from the broken heart is … It is not largely forgiven. It is an additional shame because the rest of the movie, for all the dodges, is incredible.

advertisement

Like all before the match, “Revenge of the Sith” received great criticism of her dialogue, acting, and strong dependence on special effects. Lines like “I have a high land” and “unlimited power” have become one of the largest memes in “Star Wars” – the lines that you feel impossible are not laughing at them. But is it wild to suggest that this was the point all the time? Lucas once said that the “Star Wars” films were, in essence, silent films “Because they are the stories that are listed visually; and in silent films, the relationship between the image and music is everything.” His dialogue is the least way to develop the story carefully and the most other way in which you can create more manufacturing moments of life.

advertisement

“Revenge of the Seth” is the opera – not because it is a high art, but in the emotional conditions of the story determines the largest world. Paints like Anakin crying in the council rooms that are thinking about Padmé, which leads cloning soldiers to the Jedi Temple, held in wrestling with OBI-Lan (EWAN MCGRGOR) on Mustafa while the lava erupts behind them-these moments are a full set of the movie. It is a story drawn with the largest possible strokes, which makes the details supposed to do ridiculously when you grow up. But it is clear that this was the intention of Lucas all the time.

Through six films, George Lucas tried to mix the aesthetics and movies of the old series of fictional adventure with the wide clarity of the legendary epic. To be clear, the original “Star Wars” films are great – better through most standard scales for criticizing films from the match, perhaps because Lucas had less unilateral control at first. But at the same time, it is very clear that “revenge against the seats” is the movie that he wanted to make all the time – which mixes high melodrama, bold auditory biography, Greek tragedy, Swashbuckling, and contemporary of American Excellency.

advertisement

They are often called “Shakespeare” fans in their defenses, which I think are slightly out of the base. Shakespeare’s characters live in a high world, for sure, but of a different kind. “Revenge of the Seth” is ballet, shadow doll, comedy dealerty. It is a place where fashion shows ethical alignment, where General Grivous is the monster in the cave, where you laugh at watching an evil emperor that achieves the highest strength because it is it Just very ridiculous. High emotional conditions are so high that they turn into something else. Special effects are clear, but perhaps with a purpose. You are not supposed to see this world real nor its natural dialogue. It is the stage decorated with a wonderful collection, Fly Loft, Machine, which was brought to life in the hole.

advertisement

There are very few unique films these days. Regardless of the angle, almost everything on a certain scale seems directly to the bell curve. Perhaps this is because we all intimidated Lucas hard in the early first decade of the twentieth century so that no studio concession dared to try it again, at least not with this type of budget and lights. But sitting in the theater for the sake The twentieth anniversary “Revenge of the Seth” examinationI can only think about how much a movie like it is likely, simply by throwing a completely different pattern, with a loose -tone, frankly, in this mix. I do not pretend that abstraction and the extreme clown make a best objective movie. But I think that if I saw “Revenge of the Sith”, you accept what Lucas started, there is no doubt that this is his masterpiece.