Republicans in Congress who love Trump are now different with some of his policies

Photo of author

By [email protected]


When Donald J. Trump with Republican Senators at a closed meeting in the Capitol days before his inauguration, Ross Senator Rick Scott from Florida and flowed on him on the cheerful opportunity that the party had the “right -wing” the federal government with a long -term cut, the goal of a long conservative.

Mr. Trump Broskuki has quickly agreed to convert in a different direction, according to two people who attended the meeting. He was not truly excited to discuss the customs tariff, began in a long speech about his plans, withdrawing a paper from his jacket and setting accounts for possible revenues that the nation could bring from tax imports.

The Stock Exchange emphasized the gap between Mr. Trump and many members of his party who suffer from working to pay his agenda through a closely divided conference. Although the Republicans have collected extensive financial policies such as cutting spending and expanding the tax of Mr. Trump in 2017, many do not share his enthusiasm for many of the ideas he suggested, including implementing wide tariffs and reducing corporate tax.

These differences are at the heart of the efforts of Republican leaders to collect legislation that carries the largest part of the local policy agenda of Mr. Trump-a huge draft law to reduce taxes, reduce spending and the slow migration they plan to accelerate on Democrats. It will be an essential topic for discussion this week, as Republicans in the House of Representatives in Miami are declining entitled “Presentation of the First American Agenda”.

Mr. Trump is expected to address them on Monday evening to start the gathering.

It is likely that the president – who is famous for revenge and can depend on a group of Maga allies on the willingness of Hector and the threat of any Republican standing on his way – is an unimaginable loyalty to his party when it comes to internal policy.

At a meeting with legislators this month in Fort McNeer in Washington, Stephen Miller, Deputy Chief of Staff of Mr. Trump, described the main legislation that is existential. His message, according to a person who attended the private session, was: You may not think that the bill is perfect, but this is everything and end-and you will be with us.

While the Republicans have traditionally raised a lower government spending, Mr. Trump has Announced to leave the situation Towards reducing costs and suggested a number of policies that would In fact, increasing the nation’s debts.

Some Republicans in particular have made it clear that they prefer not to include some of the proposals of Mr. Trump in the legislation, especially because they are fighting fears from the hard right Republicans that the bill will cost a lot.

But Mr. Trump was personally pressing the legislators on some of his issues. In a special meeting with the leaders of the Republican Congress in the Cabinet Hall in the White House on Wednesday, he urged them to implement his promise to eliminate taxes on advice.

He repeatedly told them that he saw this step a profitable issue, according to two people familiar with his comments that were not allowed to discuss the private meeting.

From the tax cuts collection proposed by Mr. Trump during the campaign, it gained taxes on tips the largest traction in the Capitol Hill. The idea won the support of the two parties during the campaign, and the Republican assistants are working on legislation that would translate the slogan “lack of tax on tips” into a policy that will not start the golden rush from avoiding taxes.

There are many other promises that Republicans prefer. Free Capitol Hill traders in particular felt the pledge of Mr. Trump to enact comprehensive definitions. While the president has the authority to impose a tariff from one side, some Republicans have studied the possibility of imposing definitions through the law – an idea that has proven not popular quickly within the party.

Senator Rand Paul came out of Kentucky from the closed door meeting with Mr. Trump and other Republican Senate member who said the main method in which the president discussed the price of the huge reconciliation bill through “a large and beautiful tariff”.

“I still don’t think the definitions are a good idea,” said Mr. Paul. “International trade has made the entire world incredibly prosperous, and if you look at the GDP over the past seventy years, it is a hockey stick that is going straight. I think trade is good, and international trade is great, and makes everyone richer.”

Despite the warnings of his party members in trade, Mr. Trump, who was wearing threats to close commercial partners, will probably go forward with customs tariffs. A large part of the rest of the campaign agenda – such as paying interest payments on the discount on loan tax – will require almost unanimous support from his party in Congress.

Among the ideas of Mr. Trump is to reduce corporate tax rate to 15 percent for companies that make their products in the United States. While Republicans in Capitol Hill wander around different ideas of new manufacturing incentives, some of them in the party, and even some pressure groups for companies, hope to leave the rate by 21 percent. They are concerned that reducing it will increase the cost of the bill and may offer its passage.

“I think this digs a deeper hole for us,” said Senator Tom Teleles, a member of the Finance Committee. “I am sympathetic to it, but it can be said that I think that if we are at a percentage or two others, we were fine and we had a less revenue problem.”

Mr. Trump has not burdened many of the vowed tax reductions publicly since his victory in the elections, and he is still assembled by the members of his team who will put the functions of management policy.

Some Republicans are waiting to know how difficult the Trump administration is actually to proposals such as eliminating taxes on the additional work wages before drilling away from its details. Other pledges are already fatal: Republican lawmakers and assistants expect that exempting the benefits of social security from taxes would conflict with the procedural rules in the Senate and are alternative ways to reduce taxes on the older Americans.

It is not clear how much opposition will tolerate Mr. Trump with the assembly of the package. Actress Margori Taylor Green, a close ally of Mr. Trump and Al -Feef Al -Feefa, urged her colleagues at this week’s hearing home to adhere to the full writing of Mr. Trump’s financial schedule.

“When I saw him and heard a loud campaign,” There is no tax on advice, “There is no tax on social security” and “lack of tax on additional work”, people rose to their feet while chanting loudly – standing after applause. He said. ” I promise that President Trump, especially for the Republicans, is more popular than you are in your area. “

Mr. Trump recently called on more than ten Republicans in the House of Representatives to visit him in Mar Lago, his property in Florida, to discuss the increase of the maximum of $ 10,000 on local tax discount. The president supported the maximum raising during the campaign, which made the Republicans happier than high -tax states such as New York, who made this a political priority for years. At the Florida meeting, the Republicans who focus on the issue were asked to reach a compromise that may become a law, according to the legislators who attended.

But many in the party hate deduction of local taxes, often called salt, preferring to see that it has been completely eliminated from the expansion. Republicans created the maximum value of $ 10,000 in the 2017 tax law – signed by Mr. Trump – to help compensate for the cost of the discounts they are now trying to extend.

“It is a gift to the wealthy and the states that give priority to the schedule of waking up for good judgment and paid for them by diligent taxpayers in the states that do things correctly,” said actor Keith Silf, a Republican of Texas.

These divisions have left some Republican leaders convinced that the only way they will be able to fast paper on long policy disputes is to rotate all measures to a huge bill, forcing legislators to walk in the record in one or down vote on Mr. Trump’s agenda.

This would mainly dare to the Republicans to challenge the president, a step in particular that many said they believed that their colleagues hate to make after Mr. Trump went after my representation of Chip Roy from Texas last month for his opposition to raising the debt limit.



https://static01.nyt.com/images/2025/01/27/multimedia/27dc-gop-agenda–03-wqmk/27dc-gop-agenda–03-wqmk-facebookJumbo.jpg

Source link

Leave a Comment