Ravingra Jadeja has deteriorated while Greg Chapyl’s obsession in India explodes after Headingley’s defeat

India’s five -death defeat in the first test against England raised huge questions about the team’s choice, and all eyes are now on Ravenra Jadiga. Despite the Bulling 47 amounts across both roles, Ravingra Jadeja returned with only one technician for 172 runs that revealed that there was no option to threaten the last day in Headingley.

The left round was expected to take advantage of the coarse stains that were created in the left hand area, but it remained ineffective to test five games series The opening match against England. Only in the last session, Jadeja managed to reject it Ben Stock.

Greg Chapheel blames India’s obsession with the defeat of Heideengley

But by that time, the damage was damaged, in the editorial of England Ben Dakit The game has already taken away from India. Matte the clay worsened, Jasprit Bumrah spent a day away and went without a share, leaving the Indian Bowling attack without teeth on the last decisive day when the hosts were chasing 350 runs.

Also read: JASPRIT BUMRAH OUT, Shaardul Thakur decreased with the completion of India Paces for the second test against England

Well, before the second test in Birmingham, starting from July 2, the legendary Australian cricket player Greg Chapheel blamed for the obsession of India in all cases. The former Indian coach has warned that their habit of choosing the archers who could a little back in the back in the English language conditions.

Ravindra Jadeja is not a roundabout on the front lines in English conditions: Greg Chaphel

Chapheel emphasized that if Ravindra Jadeja is mainly due to the beating, he must play as a dizzying support, not at the forefront. He believes that India should stop giving up the Poling fire depth in hitting and instead returns to specialists to do their work if they want to survive in the test chain.

“Jadeja is not a spinning in the front lines in the English language conditions. If the multiplication is good enough, it can be a dizziness of support; otherwise, rethinking is necessary. If India wants to reflect its wealth in this series, then a better team is required.”

Also read: Boki issues statement on the future

Greg Zabil urges the “insurance” strategy in India, and the bold selection calls

Moreover, the former Indian coach criticized the team’s approach to choosing a part -time archers just to strengthen the beating. Xabelle said this “insurance” policy does not help when the team needs 20 texts to win a test match, especially in England.

The Aussie Great pointed out the choice of Shadul Thakur in the first test, as he only collected 16 times in total and chose two share in one. It was suggested that India choose the best six fighters who can record the result, and the bowling attack should be chosen purely on the ability, not the depth of hitting.

Are Indians chosen under pressure now?

“I do not agree that the additional mixture that must be chosen vessels should be chosen as an insurance against a higher degree collapse. The first six must be trusted to connect operations and that the best group to secure 20 available for the available shares for the captain.”

He also urged the patriots to show courage in choosing bold groups, just like risk in this field. Chaphel said: “The determinants are the ones who are under pressure now. If the fighters and archers must be ready to bear the risks to registration and take the wickers, they must also have the courage to make bold decisions.”