Queentin Tarantino’s tank dogs were almost banned on one scene

Each Quentin Tarantino movie for one reason or another, usually to use racist insults or Hashi violence. When it comes to the last issue, a few Tarantino’s films are more famous than his movie “Tank Kalab” in 1992, which includes a The scene of corrupt torture This is still chasing viewers to this day. The scene, since most Tarantino fans will not face a reminder problem, Mr. Blondi (Michael Madsen) includes cutting the policeman’s ear, colliding with gasoline and turning almost the fire. It is a rude to do someone, and there is no doubt about it. Even the legend of horror, Wes Cravin I found it difficult in the stomach.

On paper, this scene may not seem very terrible, but what really makes it in the stomach is the way Mr. Blond takes torture. He enjoys himself here, and dances on the “stuck in the middle with you” in a song contaminated with the song forever. I am sure that the band was estimated at the royalties they got from appearing in the movie, but now their song is now linked to the division of the ear and the public wealth.

The scene was very strange, in fact, it even got the film in the UK. The British Film Classification Council (or BBFC) held a lengthy debate about the scene, wondering whether the torture sequence brought the film beyond the 18th classification that ended, which is equivalent to the British in NC-17. like BBFC explained“It has been expressed to the views that its heinous and sadistic nature will lead to the exit of some people from the movie. It has also been observed that the clear enjoyment of Mr. Blondi is what he is doing … the magic of sadism.”

Fortunately, the cold heads prevailed, and BBFC decided to keep the film in its 18th classification without “another interference.” They made this decision because, unlike many other groups you want Block books or provocative filmsBBFC seems to have an understanding of media literacy. They pointed out that Mr. Blond was presented in the film as a bad man, a person “no viewer was invited to determine (with) or to magic.” They also indicated that the scene was decisive to conspiracy, and that it was “(played) on the topics of the film for loyalty and betrayal.”

It was a more doubtful line in their defense of the scene. The method was filmed:

“The public opinion was that the scene, while generating a constant and intense atmosphere and anxiety of threats and threats, was significantly restricted to what he already showed. Regardless of a preliminary police clip that is not clear to the policeman’s face with the code, the audience does not see the ear details that are cut as the camera moves away from work, and this horror suggests only the rise.”

It is true that the least director had shown Gore for more shock, but I claim that implicit violence here is more concerned. For me, the most strange part of the scene is the moment when the camera starts, because I can clearly imagine what is going on outside the screen. The camera that also leaves the policeman also creates a feeling that we were evaluating; As long as he is on the screen, there is an illusion that he may get out of this, but the moment he left on the screen that we know has ended.

Although I do not think that the option to keep the screen outside the screen was the best reason for not interfering in the release of the movie, I am still happy “DrSpoir Dogs” I was able to avoid control thanks to this technology. The film achieved great success in the United Kingdom, as the British fans won exactly the same version of the movie that the Americans enjoyed.