Pastane can be brought to Blake Livley, Taylor Swift texts for the film

Judge spent that Justin Balouni Text messages can now be obtained Blake Blake and Taylor Swift – But only with regard to their movie, End with us.

“The proposal or demand may be, in which case it was often, the legitimate litigation tactic and an attempt to maneuver in the wider public opinion court,” Judge Luis Lehman books On Wednesday, June 18, the ruling is seen US weekly.

Swift, 35, has previously moved to drop the summons of the Balouni team, which was eventually pulled. (A source close to the matter said we While Swift’s summons was dropped because the information was voluntarily provided “to the legal Baldoni team.)

Vital, 37, then request “Preventive order“Against Baldouni team on” their ongoing demands “of its contacts with Swift earlier this month, claiming that the messages were” related “to the case.

However, Judge Lehman did not agree on his ruling on Wednesday, “given this vital I represented it quickly Knowledge of complaints or discussions about the work environment in the film, among other issues, had the requests for Swift in relation to the film, and this procedure is reasonably designed to discover information that would prove or refute the claims of harassment and revenge in Lively. “

Lively spokesman responded to the ruling in a statement to weWriting, “The court directly denied the request of the parties to Wayfarer to compel the documents from Mrs. Livly, who produced much more documents in this case more than the parties that were merged. Moreover, the court protection court depends on exactly what” prosecutors to the weeks. “

The statement continued, “As for the rest, Justin demanded the blogging and road parties to reach the private communications in Taylor Swift – although it was already called, then the summons was withdrawn. Melissa Nathan I was included in the “Scenator Planning” document (vibrant, and exhibition complaint, and indicated that it was bullying, and called for a strategy to influence the “fans base” (living amended complaint, 214 (b)). We will continue to summon the infinitely inferior efforts to exploit the popularity of Mrs. Swift, which was not more than just distraction from the serious sexual harassment and revenge that he and the road parties face. “

US weekly Contact the Swift team to comment.

The legal battle of the Ballado and give me off It started in December 2024 When the actress accused her End with us Costar and the Director of Sexual Harassment, create an enemy work environment on the movie group and organize an alleged anointing campaign against it.

In the past, she denied allegations and returned to her husband, Ryan ReynoldsAnd propaganda Leslie Sloan For 400 million dollars, he accused them of civil extortion, defamation and more, which he denied.

A blade suit against Livli, Reynolds and Chlon was rejected earlier this month, but the judge allowed the blogging and his legal team to amend their claims to violate the implicit covenant and arbitrary interference with the contract. They were awarded a final date on June 23.

“Mrs. Livly and the insistence of the expected victory for her team is wrong, so let’s be clear about the last referee,” said Brayan Friedman’s lawyer. we In a statement On June 10. While the court rejected the claims related to defamation, the court invited us to amend four out of seven claims against Mrs. Livly, which will present additional evidence and allegations issued. This case revolves around false accusations of sexual harassment and unprecedented revenge.

At the same time, at the same time, Ruling Through her Instagram stories on June 9, she wrote: “She proudly stood by 19 united organizations in defending women’s rights to talk about her safety. Like many others, she felt the pain of a revenge suit, including the manufactured shame that tries to break us.”